President Biden on Monday night issued a plea for supporters to donate to his campaign in the wake of former President Trumpās victory in Iowa.
āLooks like Donald Trump just won Iowa. Heās the clear front runner on the other side at this point,ā Biden wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.
āBut hereās the thing: this election was always going to be you and me vs. extreme MAGA Republicans. It was true yesterday and itāll be true tomorrow,ā Biden added, posting a link to a fundraising page.
Donāt misunderstand my reticence to imply that these things cannot happen, conspiracies obviously often occur and have tons of historical substantial weight, I just prefer my conspiracies incontrovertible.
Why do you believe that the CIA and mossaf specifically were running this pedophile ring with Epstein?
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200106-jeffrey-epstein-was-blackmailing-politicians-for-israels-mossad-new-book-claims/
https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/23/long-before-epstein-sex-traffickers-spy-agencies/
https://www.mintpressnews.com/shocking-origins-jeffrey-epstein-blackmail-roy-cohn/260621/
https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/
the following arenāt directly related to epstein, but just evidence of whatās happened in history: https://www.activistpost.com/2017/07/largest-sex-trafficking-ring-western-us-busted-children-openly-sold-plain-sight.html
https://gizadeathstar.com/2016/10/arrests-us-sex-trafficking-ring-leaders/
https://humansbefree.com/2019/10/is-the-mormon-church-behind-a-worldwide-child-sex-trafficking-ring-operating-out-of-arizona.html
Okay so like circumstantial, proximal attribution.
I get it, I just donāt think it helps to assert suspicions as fact until those facts are less malleable.
I have not read that first book, have you read that book?
I did specifically note the word ātheoryā when I posited my assertion.
Additionally the book is called āEpstein: Dead men tell no talesā and I canāt make a 100% confirmation that the books integrity has been maintained as I read a translated version (overview here: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48720807-epstein), the overview presented by the book is, in my opinion, extremely watered down and appears to have been censored, either in context or content, to provide a minimally invasive view of what happens behind closed doors.
The book could be used as a foray into questioning authority, but not as a reason to riot or scream, more as a thought provoking and reflecting work to allow others to look more seriously at those theyāve allowed into power.
Itās not as though itās terribly āeye openingā as Iāve worked with various governments and government related organizations so not a lot phazes me any more, but it isnāt something I would recommend against reading.
Yea, fair.
If any circumstantial conspiracy deserves to be looked at, itās the one where the multi-millionaire friendly with presidents is arrested for his private island pedophile ring, put on suicide watch, and still commits an unrecorded, unwitnessed suicide before he has the opportunity to make any statements.