On Friday, District Judge Aileen Cannon issued a new order in the Donald Trump classified documents case adding to the mountain of evidence that she is firmly in the former presidentās pocket. Trump appointed Cannon in 2020 and the Senate confirmed her appointment in the days after he lost the 2020 election. Itās deeply offensive to the rule of law for judges to bend the law to benefit those who put them on the bench. Sadly, Cannon does just that.
Cannonās new ruling rejected special counsel Jack Smithās entirely standard request that she order Trump to state whether he intends to rely on an āadvice of counselā defense ahead of the trial, currently scheduled for May 20. Advance notice of the defense helps expedite a trial because defendants asserting it need to provide additional discovery to prosecutorsāraising the defense means that defendants must disclose all communications with their attorneys, as the defense waives the attorneyāclient privilege.
Judge Cannonās brief order asserted that Smithās motion was ānot amenable to proper consideration at this juncture, prior to at least partial resolution of pretrial motionsā and further discovery.
Sound innocuous? Itās anything but. Instead, itās part of a pattern weāve already seen of Cannon laying the groundwork for delaying Trumpās trialāuntil itās too late for a jury to be empaneled and the case tried to verdict before the election.
Removed by mod
10-4 Rambo, youāre the real hero.
Ah yes, the idea that your pea shooter can deal with tanks and drones flown from under a mountain in Colorado. Nah, youāll get blown up, they wonāt find enough parts to identify you, and the world will turn onward.
Why are you waging a conventional war? Resistance doesnāt fight in the open.
Ah yes, the dumbass idea that the U.S. is able to take out insurgents the way it did in Afghanistan and Iraq, parroted robotically by some bootlicker any time anyone even so much as whispers the obvious solution to our problems
Fuck off, sycophant
LOL this is the top comment in the thread. You managed to project your own insecurities and make it personal, which is the weirdest way to react to a random internet comment.
LOL this is one of the most mediocre comments in the thread. Criticizing someoneās response instead of offering anything substantive because youāre looking to forum slide. Well, it wonāt work.
I donāt wanna hear it.
The American people absolutely are capable of overthrowing their own government, and they will be morally justified in doing so if Trump wins and actually starts doing the insane genocidal bullshit heās been promising his camp.
Get over it.
All I hear is āI can be mean and itās your problemā, which gets you a block. āI donāt want to hear itā and āGet over itā is also projection on your end and shows a very narcissistic mind. Iāll fortunately never see your reply, so, ya know, have a nice day I guess.
Advocating shooting lessons in the wake of a 2nd Trump term is a call to violence under rule 6. Removed. 24 hour ban.
Fortunately the rules allow for celebrating violence and advocating for nonviolent deaths. If youāre going to be pedantic about the exact meaning of your rules to stifle opposition, write better rules.
Rule 6 is NOT ambiguous:
āNo hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warningā
Telling people to practice shooting if Trump is re-elected, or, hell, if ANYONE is elected, is advocating violence.
I advocate shooting lessons because you donāt want to hit the wrong object. Isnāt that a safe thing to advocate for? š
Do we need to talk in code like unalive someone in Minecraft/Roblox?
I absolutely encourage good firearms safety IN GENERAL. Youāre never too young to learn good trigger discipline. ;)
Advocating it in response to an election or other political event carries unfortunate connotations which isnāt allowed.
Iām actually quite pleased at the number of gun groups that have popped up on Lemmy. Liberal Gun Owners for example, I think thereās one for LGBTQ shooters as well. Canāt recall the name of it.
Since someone is going to be elected pretty much no matter what, āpractice shooting if a tone is electedā is logically equivalent to āpractice shootingā.
Banning proponents of 2A is a bit weird for a politics sub but I like it. Gun nuts are crazy.
Oh, I have no problem with proponents of the 2nd Amendment, itās when you start talking about the 2nd Amendment in connection with other people that thereās going to be a problem.
āTrump just became the nominee? Better brush up on the 2nd Amendmentā¦ā Surely you see the tone there. Itās really no different than what Trump was saying on 1/6, only actually invoking weapons.
I donāt own firearms. And I donāt appreciate shitheels implying that I do.
Not everyone with an agenda fills it with killing people to make the sex hot at home.
Because that is the pig game: they figured out how hot the sex is after beating someone or a kill.
And that is what they canāt give up. Their ultimate VIAGRA : Kill and fuck.
Addicted to killing and fucking is what a badge is all about.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/police-trainer-best-sex-killing/
Youāre right.
If the fascists take over, itās better to quietly sit on the sidelines and hope youāre not one of the targeted undesirables.
First they came for the trans people, and I did not actā
Because I was not trans.
Then they came for the gay people , and I did not actā
Because I was not gay.
Then they came for the immigrants, and I did not actā
Because I was not an immigrant.
Then they came for the women, and I did not actā
Because I was not a woman.
Then they came for the āwokeā, and I did not actā
Because I was not āwokeā.
Then they came for meāand there was no one left to act for me.
Had the original on my bedroom wall throughout childhood. I think ny son is about to grow up with that plus yours. Everyone should know this one
Thanks for the copy pasta everyone has seen 20 times a month since 2016
Gee wonder why itās popping up so often?
Lack of creativity and algo-chasing.
Ding ding ding
LOL people actually downvoted you for saying that you donāt have or like guns.
I was actually about to upvote for that first paragraph, but downvoted because of the rest.
And hey, I mean, ACAB, Iām not defending cops. Cops are selected for stupidity and aggression, trained to murder, and held above the law. Even the best of them are still part of a system that is oppressive by design.
But what that trainer was saying was true, and an important thing to acknowledge for anybody who is likely to be in life-and-death situations - firefighters, paramedics, even social workers. Go to the Snopes link he included and read the whole thing.
Sex is a normal reaction to danger. It doesnāt mean that cops are going out and killing people just to have better sex, thatās stupid. Theyāre killing people, yes, for lots of reasons, but thatās not one of them. Itās almost as dumb as the QAnon quacks talking about adrenochrome.
Americans are blood thirsty, genocidal monsters. What did you expect? Lmaoooooooooo