Let’s see. You called for a “master tutor” of “antifa praxis” but let’s assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as “strong”. And now you’re implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Then they would be composting Nazis, and making better arrows.
But I am sure that’s what the “not-worth-reading” had in mind, right?
Let’s see. You called for a “master tutor” of “antifa praxis” but let’s assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as “strong”. And now you’re implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
Could you be a dear and point to who patronized who?
I was referring to the stuff you wrote after that but it’s fine if you don’t want to talk about it.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Let’s see, do you know about turf warfare?
But what about this?
Wikipedia’s random page? What of it?
Yeah, seems irrelevant, doesn’t it?
It depends. Do you want to talk about racists’ turfs, or anarchist zones?