Dana Bash on CNN calling the BS out

  • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    A good rule of thumb is that if you made it in your home from real ingredients it’s probably much healthier than if some company did food science on it until it human testers said “yeah I’d love more of that one”.

    That’s right, and exactly what I said. It’s a good rule of thumb. It’s not, however, a well defined scientific category. The reason the rule of thumb works is that if you cook something yourself from ingredients it’s probably got more fiber, more vitamins, less sugar, and less fat, than the commercial alternative. Not because it has fewer processing steps done to it.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not the processing, it’s the preservatives and other edible non-food junk they put in to make it last longer and keep customers coming back for more and more and more.

      It’s called food science, and it works. It works very well indeed. Way too well for our health. You test for moreishness and you manufacture the ones the panel loves and wants more of. Result? Food that people really want more of. Its not magic and it’s not deliberately bad, it’s just that the inevitable result is the obesity epidemic.

      • Exatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You know that food science shows that there isn’t nearly as much of a problem as you claim, right, sparky?