A lawyer for the union says the company is aligning itself with right-wing ideologues who want to destroy the regulatory state.

Trader Joeā€™s is facing a litany of union-busting charges before the National Labor Relations Board. The agencyā€™s prosecutors have accused the company of illegally retaliating against workers, firing a union supporter and spreading false information in an effort to chill an organizing campaign.

But in a hearing last Tuesday, the grocerā€™s attorney briefly summarized a sweeping defense it intends to mount against the charges: The labor board itself, which was created during the New Deal and has refereed private-sector collective bargaining for nearly 90 years, is ā€œunconstitutional.ā€

The argument would appear to fit inside a broader conservative effort to dismantle the regulatory state, which has taken aim at agencies tasked with enforcing laws to protect workers, consumers and the environment.

The exchange, a transcript of which HuffPost obtained through a public records request, came at the start of a trial to determine whether Trader Joeā€™s violated workersā€™ rights. Trader Joeā€™sā€™ attorney, Christopher Murphy of the law firm Morgan Lewis, informed the judge, Charles Muhl, that there was ā€œone final thingā€ the grocery chain wanted to add to its defense before proceedings began.

  • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    I donā€™t think the politicians ever actually believed what they were saying. Itā€™s dog whistles and straight up lies all the way downā€¦.

    Some regular Joeā€™s on the street might ā€œbelieveā€ in the ideals of small government but itā€™s far easier to say things like family values and small government, words that without policy donā€™t actually mean anything.