@anders@BeefPiano Just to make it clear: do you suggest that males should ignore feminine beauty? Or even strive for ugly women?
Seems like a very popular future suggestion.
@explodicle What do you mean by writing “no offense”?
Also, “no offense” but you could actually think about what’s written, and why.
But I help you in case you cannot process: the definition of “sexist” is pretty flexible it seems, and depends on the agenda of the observer.
I meant it literally, and suggest interpreting sexist literally as well. It doesn’t mean only ugly women or whatever. I don’t have anything further to add that can’t be found on Websters or Wikipedia, have a good day.
@anders @BeefPiano Just to make it clear: do you suggest that males should ignore feminine beauty? Or even strive for ugly women?
Seems like a very popular future suggestion.
No offense but you might want to take some more time to consider what they’ve written.
@explodicle What do you mean by writing “no offense”?
Also, “no offense” but you could actually think about what’s written, and why.
But I help you in case you cannot process: the definition of “sexist” is pretty flexible it seems, and depends on the agenda of the observer.
I meant it literally, and suggest interpreting sexist literally as well. It doesn’t mean only ugly women or whatever. I don’t have anything further to add that can’t be found on Websters or Wikipedia, have a good day.
@explodicle You are up for banning stereotyping. Good luck for that, see you later and have a nice day.
Nope, read again literally
@explodicle Nope, it was an offense, so you have missed possibly all the points.
Especially the ban part! We’re having entirely unconnected conversations here.