Im on a Dell G5 15 laptop with a 1660ti. I set my built in monitor to 125%, and that looks fine, but for some reason my second monitor seems to be zoomed in a bunch, even though that is still at 100% I kinda need my laptop screen zoomed in since its so small, any advice? Pop!_OS LTS, dont remember version, but says “most recent”

  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
    6·
    9 months ago

    Do you have the proprietary Nvidia drivers installed?

    Maybe also try different settings, like 150 instead of 125%, etc.

      • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
        41·
        9 months ago

        Is there any reason for you to use the LTS version of Pop?

        I mean, recommending someone to jump from one to another distro because one thing doesn’t work is bad advice, but if you don’t have any compelling reasons to use the very outdated stale version, I’d recommend switching to either the normal non-LTS version, or to another distro all together.

        If you decide for the latter, maybe consider Bazzite (for gaming) or uBlue. They both have a Nvidia -variant with the drivers already baked in.
        Those drivers are known to break or be unreliable, so you always have the certainty that everything will work on this immutable system.
        They both are very modern, offering the newest desktop versions, and should provide you a great monitor setup due to the new display protocol.

        • strawberry@kbin.runOP
          1·
          9 months ago

          im using lts as its the only version available. im using pop because its the distro that gave me the least issues

          • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
            3·
            9 months ago

            With “gave me the fewest issues” you probably mean stuff like screen tearing, flickering, etc.?

            That’s because Pop ships with Nvidia drivers, which many other distros, like Ubuntu, often don’t do due to licensing.

            As I said, it is pretty old and didn’t receive any bigger updates in the last 2 years.
            The devs of Pop are currently very busy creating the new DE and don’t have much time left for their current distro.

            Maybe check out something that’s more maintained. If you just installed it freshly, switching shouldn’t be a big issue. You can recreate everything Pop has on Fedora (uBlue silverblue-nvidia) or other Gnome based distros too and get the newest stuff, which will hugely increase the chances of everything working good with your setup.

            What specific things do you like on Pop the most? Only the “just works”?

            • strawberry@kbin.runOP
              1·
              9 months ago

              yeah the biggest issue has been screen tearing. might switch. how much will I lose if I have a separate boot, root, and home partition?

              all I have are some programs I stalled, nothing crazy

              • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
                1·
                9 months ago

                I don’t think you will loose anything.
                You can reinstall another distro onto the current configuration, and it will use that.

                But I personally would recommend just doing a clean install in the way the distro recommends it, or you might run into some problems.

                You have to backup first anyway.

                • strawberry@kbin.runOP
                  1·
                  9 months ago

                  so like keep the pop parts, and then make more for other distros? id like to keep pop while experimenting with others

                  • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    9 months ago

                    Imagine you have a 500Gb SSD.

                    If you allocate 100GB to Windows, 200GB to Pop and 200 GB to Fedora (or another distro) you will still be able to boot on pop and retain those documents while having an entirely different OS (fedora) from which you can boot with its own files and config which won’t impact your Pop.

                    If you’re more tech savvy you can even create a share partition on which you can store files that are easily transferrable between these 3 OS.

                • strawberry@kbin.runOP
                  1·
                  9 months ago

                  also, could you give me a rundown of the differences between fedora, ublue, silverblue, and bazzite? i see theyre all based on fedora, but some must do somethings better

                  • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    9 months ago

                    I’m not the original replier. I’m not sure these differences since I’m using another distro. This is my best take : take it with a grain of salt.

                    Silverblue is container based : each program is independent for security and stability. They are containes as flatpaks.

                    Ublue and bazzite are docker based, meaning they are immutable, meaning they should work as expected and are very stable.

                    Fedora is the base distro. It’s like Pop!_OS

                  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
                    1·
                    9 months ago

                    Original replier here 😁
                    They are all very similar.

                    • Fedora (Workstation) is the “OG” Fedora. It’s the oldest and most wide spread one, and often considered as the best Ubuntu alternative because of its sane defaults and big community. I used it for years and it was good.
                    • Silverblue is the “new” “immutable” variant. Check out my post why image based distros are so awesome. https://feddit.de/post/8234416 On the surface, it behaves exactly like the normal Fedora, but under the hood, it’s indestructible. There are other flavours of this atomic Fedora variant with KDE and more DEs too if you want.
                    • uBlue is basically a “tool” to make custom Fedora Atomic installs. To make very deep changes in the immutable Fedora, you have to change the image itself. And those said custom images provide huge QoL benefits and better hardware support, especially for Nvidia.
                    • And Bazzite is one variant of uBlue. It’s a gaming distro and provides many tweaks and tools ootb. I’m using it too on my gaming PC and the performance difference is noticeable.

                    I recommend Fedora Atomic because, especially uBlue, “just works”. If something should ever break, you can easily roll back. And the small tweaks provided by uBlue provide you a very sane system out of the box.
                    It’s way easier to learn imo than traditional systems. Yes, you might have to learn how to use distrobox, but that’s one single tool. Learning how to troubleshoot a whole OS is way harder, and you don’t have to worry about managing your OS.

                    What I wouldn’t recommend is Nobara. It’s a one-man-project and very very insecure. Either go with the official Fedora, or go with uBlue.

                  • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    11·
                    9 months ago

                    So, I don’t reccomend jumping to an immutable distro if you are a beginner. Nobara is a gaming distro more in line with what I wouod reccomend