livus@kbin.social to Not The Onion@lemmy.world · 9 months agoScientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed articlearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1131arrow-down1external-linkScientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed articlearstechnica.comlivus@kbin.social to Not The Onion@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarejpreston2005@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 months agoI mean, they just recently showed that a huge amount of scientific articles are just that, gibberish. Nonsensical scientific mumbo-jumbo wrapped up within a thin veneer of credibility. Scientific authors will pay for these in order to strengthen their resume. I kinda wonder why they don’t just skip a step, and just put fake stuff directly on the resume, but hey, they’re the scientists
minus-squarelivus@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-29 months ago@jpreston2005 resumes are digital these days and you link to the DOI of your paper so recruiters and funders can check with one click.
I mean, they just recently showed that a huge amount of scientific articles are just that, gibberish. Nonsensical scientific mumbo-jumbo wrapped up within a thin veneer of credibility. Scientific authors will pay for these in order to strengthen their resume.
I kinda wonder why they don’t just skip a step, and just put fake stuff directly on the resume, but hey, they’re the scientists
@jpreston2005 resumes are digital these days and you link to the DOI of your paper so recruiters and funders can check with one click.