By John Pring on 22nd February 2024
Disabled activists have announced a fightback against a series of âhorrificâ government social security reforms and have called for âactive resistanceâ to the plans, starting with a national day of action and a protest in London early next month.
A meeting in parliament this week heard that disabled people could not wait for the general election, because there was no guarantee that a Labour government would reverse the governmentâs proposals.
Instead, they called for a return to street protest, led by Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), to resist Conservative plans to cut out-of-work disability benefits and introduce other harmful social security reforms.
That resistance will begin with a day of action on 4 March, which will include a protest in central London two days before the spring budget.
Mondayâs meeting was attended by leading disabled peopleâs organisations from across the UK, and senior figures from two major unions: PCS, which represents many frontline DWP workers, and Unite, which has close links with disabled activists.
Among DPACâs concerns are government plans to intensify the conditions and sanctions imposed on benefit claimants, and to tighten the work capability assessment (WCA).
They also point to proposals that will eventually scrap the WCA, and rely instead on the personal independence payment (PIP) assessment.
This could see benefit cuts for hundreds of thousands of disabled people and new powers for unqualified work coaches to decide what work-related activity a disabled person should carry out.
DPAC also says that hundreds of thousands of disabled people could be at risk of having their benefits sanctioned by the governmentâs roll-out of so-called âin-work conditionalityâ*.
Ellen Clifford, of DPAC and the UK coalition of Deaf and disabled peopleâs organisations that monitors the implementation of the UN disability convention, said disabled people were now faced with âanother set of horrific proposals in the pipelineâ after 14 years of their lives becoming âharder and harderâ under Conservative-led governments.
She said Labour had promised to work in co-production with disabled people on social security policy if it won power, but disabled people remembered that it was Labour that introduced the WCA âand find it difficult to trust where that co-production will goâ.
She said: âThe line seems to be that Labour needs to present itself as being tough on welfare reform in order to get elected.â
She added: âWe simply canât afford to wait until after an election and definitely not for a lengthy process of co-production to start fighting back against these horrific proposals.
âWe canât wait for anyone else to stop them.â
Paula Peters, a member of DPACâs national steering group, told the meeting that âstrong and principled leadershipâ was needed to oppose the âcompletely unacceptableâ government reforms and to raise awareness among the public about why they were wrong, but âLabour clearly isnât going to do thatâ.
She said: âWe need to build a united campaign that speaks loudly to say that these changes are completely unacceptable, and we need to demand instead a social security system that is fair for all, one that provides a social safety net that affords a decent living, one that we can access without having our mental health destroyed, and one that doesnât kill us.â
She said that was why DPAC has called the national day of action for 4 March, two days before the spring budget, which will include a protest in London, and â it is hoped â other protests organised by local groups around the country, while DPAC will also suggest ways that disabled activists can take part from home.
Andy Greene, a member of DPACâs national steering group, who has played a crucial role in past DPAC direct action, told the meeting: âI think there is a real need just to get back on the streets⊠and make sure weâre a street presence again, because I think that is where our strength came from previously.
âI think that re-establishing that commitment to street politics is important for any campaign.â
John McDonnell, the Labour MP, DPAC member and former shadow chancellor, who hosted the meeting, said he believed the event was about the ârelaunch of a resistance movement on disabilityâ after years of âcuts, austerity, stigma, threats, and, to be frank, abuseâ.
He said it was vital to âdemonstrate we are back againâ and that disabled people needed to âmobiliseâ and âruthlessly pursueâ their demands.
He said: âI just get angry about it, that we are back to where we were after all these years, and there are too many people suffering as a result of that.
âSo, this time we canât allow ourselves to fail.â
Megan Thomas, policy and research officer for Disability Wales, told the meeting that disabled people and their allies âmust fight these announcements with all that we haveâ.
She said Disability Wales research on the cost-of-living crisis had found an âextremely flawedâ social security system that was âhumiliating, traumatising and incredibly complicatedâ.
And she said the governmentâs proposed changes would âdo nothing to support people into work and do nothing to support people out of povertyâ.
Douglas Bryce, deputy chief executive of Disability Equality Scotland, said it was still unclear how the UK government reforms would impact on Scotland, as the Scottish government has introduced its own version of personal independence payment.
But he said he needed to ârobustly highlight the potential danger of suicide and increased hospitalisation, particularly of those with mental health issuesâ if the UK governmentâs proposals are brought in.
Michael Lorimer, from The Omnibus Partnership, a grassroots organisation of disabled people in Northern Ireland, said: âThe new proposals are brutal and will unquestionably cause more poverty, deaths and suicides if they are not stopped.
âFor this, we need to unite across the UK to build a strong resistance, so that whoever comes to power at the next general election knows that if they cut disability benefits and dare to try what the Tories are proposing, they will face serious, coordinated grassroots opposition.â
He said that Deaf and disabled campaigners in Northern Ireland were organising to set up a Northern Ireland branch of DPAC.
Svetlana Kotova, director of campaigns and justice at Inclusion London, said it was vital to find a way to communicate the financial distress disabled people were facing to the general public âwho the Labour party probably thinks wants them to be tough on social securityâ.
She said: âI want to think that they donât know the horrific situation we are in and wouldnât support further cuts.â
She called for support from other organisations for the Disabled Peopleâs Manifesto, which includes a call for a rights-based social security system, abolition of sanctions and a decent income for disabled people.
Marion Fellows, the SNPâs Westminster spokesperson on disability, the only MP apart from McDonnell to attend the meeting, said she had spoken frequently in parliament about the pledge made by Social Security Scotland â set up by the Scottish SNP government â to provide âdignity, fairness and respectâ.
She said: âThatâs what most people expect, and thatâs what should be a right for disabled people.â
Ian Pope, acting vice-president of the PCS union, and its DWP vice-president, said his union represented members who âadminister this awful benefits systemâ, with many of them also subject to that system as claimants.
He told the meeting of the dossier of evidence that was presented to DWP late last year and showed the depth of the departmentâs âstaffing crisisâ, with his members âgoing under at an alarming rateâ.
He said: âThese testimonies demonstrated that the staffing crisis at DWP is creating an epidemic of mental ill-health among staff and has failed to protect the most vulnerable citizens in society.â
He said DWP had been trying â and failing â to recruit 20,000 more staff.
He said: âWhy could it be that people donât want to come and work in the DWP?
âCould it be that 25,000 admin staff at the Department for Work and Pensions, and Iâm one included, are currently earning less than the national living wage?
âIt is an absolutely shocking state of affairs.â
He said that many of the 13,500 work coaches who joined DWP during the pandemic have left.
He added: âThey told the department when they left, and they told the union when they left: âThis isnât what I signed up for. I thought I was joining the DWP to make a difference, to help the most vulnerable people in society, not to issue sanctions, not to issue conditionality, not to harass people into offices.ââ
He also pointed to Social Security Scotlandâs âdignity, fairness and respectâ pledge, and said: âImagine the Westminster DWP putting that on their website.
âThat has to be something we aspire to, everybody in this room, we have to aspire to, our future Labour government have to aspire to that.â
Brett Sparkes, a regional officer for Unite, which represents both workers and benefit claimants who donât have jobs, said his union was campaigning against in-work conditionality.
He said that this and other government proposals, including changes to the WCA, âwill increase the conditionality demands on disabled people to take jobs that not only do not suit them but offer no route to progressionâ and will keep people âin a cycle of low pay and insecure workâ.
*Under in-work conditionality, those universal credit claimants who already have a paid job must still meet DWP requirements to look for further part-time jobs, increased hours from their current employer, or higher-paid jobs, or face a possible sanction
Picture: A DPAC direct action protest
A note from the editor:
Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.
Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.
Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNSâŠ