• Nudding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      il y a 2 ans

      Do you think that someone who isn’t automatically against a genocide should be in charge?

      • root_beer@midwest.socialdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        il y a 2 ans

        It’d be nice, sure, but who’s going to fill that role in November? Realistic answers only, please

        • Nudding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          il y a 2 ans

          If your only two options are genocide, you don’t deserve to be a country anymore 🙊.

            • Nudding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              il y a 2 ans

              A country so proudly against tyranny with 3 guns per person:

              “Oh sorry our hands are tied, I guess those brown children will have to be genocided.”

                • Nudding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  il y a 2 ans

                  Ah yes, revolution has always historically been peaceful and achieved through voting lol.