Former President Donald Trump told an entirely fictional story on Saturday about how he had supposedly outwitted his Democratic opponents by releasing ā€œthe tapeā€ of theĀ 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that was a key factor inĀ Trumpā€™s first impeachment.

ā€¦

Facts First:Ā Trumpā€™s story is a complete fabrication. No tape of his call with Zelensky was ever released; Pelosi could not possibly have been angry with her allies after hearing a tape of the call because she has never heard a tape of the call. In fact, as of nearly five years after the July 2019 call, there isĀ noĀ known US recordingĀ of the conversation. What Trumpā€™s White House actually released in September 2019 was aĀ rough written transcriptĀ of the call ā€” whichĀ corroborated, rather than contradicted, aĀ government whistleblowerā€™s central allegationsĀ about what Trump had said.Ā Pelosi spokesperson Aaron Bennett said Sunday that Trumpā€™s story is ā€œfact-free nonsense.ā€

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Former President Donald Trump told an entirely fictional story on Saturday about how he had supposedly outwitted his Democratic opponents by releasing ā€œthe tapeā€ of the 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that was a key factor inĀ Trumpā€™s first impeachment.

    Trump claimed that Pelosi was told, ā€œLetā€™s just pretend he did and keep going forward.ā€ He continued, ā€œAfter they made up the story and then after that they heard the tape, they died.

    Retired Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who was one of the officials listening to Trumpā€™s call with Zelensky in his role at the time as the top Ukraine expert for the White Houseā€™s National Security Council (and who later became an important witness in the impeachment inquiry), told CNN in a text message on Sunday that there is ā€œno recordingā€ of the call.

    But that Trump claim never made any sense, either ā€” because, in reality, he released the rough transcript beforeĀ Schiff gave hisĀ exaggerated rendition of itĀ at a congressional hearing.

    In Trumpā€™s 2019 versions of the story, he claimed that Pelosi had been dismayed with her allies after she read the rough transcript, not after she listened to ā€œthe tape.ā€ But there was no basis even for that claim; after the rough transcript was released, Pelosi issued aĀ scathing statementĀ accusing Trump of ā€œlawlessnessā€ and attempting ā€œto shake down other countries for the benefit of his campaign.ā€Ā A Pelosi spokesperson told CNN in 2019 that Trumpā€™s account of her supposed thoughts was ā€œcomplete fiction.ā€

    He told the ā€œtapeā€ version of the story while again bashing Schiff, who is now running for a US Senate seat in California.


    The original article contains 716 words, the summary contains 269 words. Saved 62%. Iā€™m a bot and Iā€™m open source!