Labour plans to axe all hereditary peers from the House of Lords, reports have suggested.

But the 92 hereditary lords who sit in Parliament’s upper chamber would still be allowed to retain their access to the Palace of Westminster as a sweetener, the Financial Times has reported.

This would allow them to still enjoy access to Parliament’s bars and subsidised restaurants.

Labour has previously vowed to abolish the unelected upper chamber of Parliament, with Sir Keir Starmer having branded it “undemocratic”.

  • NotACube@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I never thought of it before but your comment just made me realise this would be a great backdoor way to get the PR ball rolling. Make the lord’s elected with a full PR system. Maybe with half the seats going up for election every 7 years or something.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I which case it should become the primary chamber. Having the second chamber be more representative of public opinion would be yet another way the commons would repress the views of the people.

    • gedhrel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The issue with this is the same as with the mayoral system. The next tine the Tories get a turn, they replace it with FPTP and claim it’s “more democratic”.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m pretty sure I’ve seen that suggested before, it would make a lot of sense, so obviously it will never happen.