• taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The EU can, by definition, afford more than any individual member can. Obviously defense would need to be handled by a separate budget but uncoordinated defense strategies for every member are certainly worse.

      • eleitl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        2% of GDP is about 20% of the annual budget, which is not sustainable these days. 3% is ludicrous.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not sure what you are trying to say and how it relates to whether EU member states all do their own uncoordinated thing with their money or pool that very same money to do something coordinated on the EU level for defense.

          • eleitl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            2% of GDP is a minimum ask for spending for NATO members. It looks small, but 2% of GDP is 20% of the annual budget which is not elastic, unless you consider the bulk which is social spending omittable. The general public will soon convince you it’s not.

            Coordinated anything doesn’t work because modern wars are about infrastructure and logistics. Hence the 2% per member scaling.