• birdcat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    First source in the executive summary?

    ADRIAN ZENZ

    Tells you everything you need to know about this “research paper” 🥱

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its exhausting to see one guy as the focal point of all anti-China criticism.

      It just feels like getting all your news about Joe Biden from The Daily Caller.

      • birdcat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Adrian Zenz is a right-wing christian fundamentalist, in his own words, “sent by god to destroy the CCP”. For his mission, he is ready to make up lots of crazy stuff. After he gets proven to be factually wrong or that he does not in any way have any form of scientific evidence for any of his claims, he doubles down on them. His “research” does not follow any scientifically acceptable method. For example, the figure millions of detained Uyghurs came from a sample group of 8 (eight) interviews. So even if you ignore his religious views and his political motivation in his work, the lack of scientific methods makes it unacceptable to cite him in a paper.

        Lots of people put lots of effort into debunking his claims. Use a search engine and dig in!

        Or use the opposite approach, thats what I did! Around 2019 when Zenz came up with his claims of the Uyghur Genocide, I was so shocked and found them so crazy and unacceptable that I really wanted to learn everything about it and find the evidence, understand whats going on. I had an unfavorable view of China (to put it mildly honestly) and was super motivated. Well… never found any evidence of genocide, cultural genocide, or anything coming close to such things, but it almost turned me into a Tankie, so always remain critical 😊

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I looked up Adrian zenz as soon as I received this comment. Zealots aren’t very endearing to me, But since his studies regarding Uyghurs haven’t been disproved, I kind of let the Christianity go.

          There’s definitely a cultural genocide happening in xinjiang though, their culture is being dismantled very rapidly.

          Camp guards and former prisoners and free citizens of xinjiang all attest to the CCP concentration camps, that uyghurs aren’t allowed to practice their religion or speak their mother tongue.

          I don’t understand how you didn’t find any evidence. Do you mean you just don’t believe any of the articles or interviews or documentaries about the Uyghur re-education camps?

          This is one of the concentration camps that a BBC News team was allowed inside of:

          https://youtu.be/WmId2ZP3h0c

          • birdcat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Either you have a genuine interest in learning more and knowing what’s going on - which will require a little effort and a bit of an open mind to expand the sources you might be used to - or you check a few sites and videos that kinda confirm what you want to believe and then fill out the rest with your assumptions and prejudices. 

            his studies regarding Uyghurs haven’t been disapproved

            Ok, they haven’t. You are interested in the matter and want to learn more about it, right? Then go read his studies, see what they consist of, and see why no one has been able to disprove the findings of Adrian Zenz. 

            There’s definitely a cultural genocide happening in xinjiang though, their culture is being dismantled very rapidly.

            That is terrible then, and you care about it, right? Then go and learn more about it. Learn about the history of Xinjiang and how the lives of the people in that region have changed over the last few decades. Research how Uyghur culture is being dismantled very rapidly. 

            Find actual proof for what you want to be true. 

            One last thing, I really never said that there were or are no re-education camps. They played a very vital role in the war against terror. You claiming that I said they never existed, annoyed me. 

            Anyway, all the best.   

            Recommendations to start:

            1. Super casual YouTube-Channel, often about what’s Life in Xinjiang really like. Li Jingjing 李菁菁
            2. Short current Article: Imperialist media can’t stop lying about mosques in China
            3. Kinda long read about the War on Terror: Xinjiang: A Report and Resource Compilation, Sep 21, Written By Qiao Collective
            • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You claim that there is no proof for a cultural genocide against the uyghurs.

              Right here: “Well… never found any evidence of genocide, cultural genocide, or anything coming close to such things”.

              Above, I’ve linked proof provided by the CCP showing uyghurs not allowed to speak their language, practice their religion, and the Chinese officials in charge of that camp saying that they detained innocent uyghurs before they commit crime because they might commit a crime later.

              Cultural genocide is the genocide of a culture, in case you find the term too oblique. By indefinitely detaining free and innocent people until they stop practicing their culture and begin practicing the culture approved by the CCP, the CCP is practicing cultural genocide, contrary to your claim.

              Strangely(but I appreciate it) you subsequently backpedal and you even agree with me that “uyghur culture is being dismantled very rapidly.”

              Yes, thank you, I agree.

              I never claimed you didn’t believe in the existence of Uyghur concentration camps; I asked you how, with video and journalistic evidence of the concentration camps(where cultural genocide is occurring), do you still not believe in that evidence of cultural genocide.

              • user6574839384@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                *CPC (Communist Party of China is the official term)

                Read my other reply first; this is part two. You claim that Zenz’s studies on Uyghurs haven’t been disproven, but this is incorrect, they are accepted because they fit a narrative. For one, Zenz has deliberately lied about China in the past, like claiming that the Chinese government was trying to suppress the fact that COVID-19 was transmissible between humans, despite China confirming this fact a day earlier. For refutations of his research, see [1] and [2]. It genuinely seems like you’re just ignorant, but maybe I’m wrong. Hope to see a reply.

                • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I understand the points you’re trying to make, but they fall apart very quickly in light of regional, global and historical context.

                  I’ve read and watched all of your links, and I’m replying with regard to your requested order.

                  Why are the Chinese throwing specifically Uyghurs into concentration camps and destroying their culture when there are so many minorites to oppress? Three big reasons: 1) Uyghurs look radically different than han Chinese, they look middle eastern and european rather than other minority ethnicities in China. 2) 94 percent of the Chinese population lives on the east coast of China. Uyghurs, 3000 miles west and thousands of miles closer geographically to Europe and the Middle East, are uniquely positioned to open diplomatic ties with other countries, 3) historically culturally distinct from the rest of China(being Muslim and near Europe, Uyghur schools taught multiple languages from a young age). Because of this relative academic excellence at the time,(distinguishing the rest of china) xinjiang was the only province of China not completely physically dismantled by mao during his rampage against “old culture”. Uyghur education was a good example for mao to point to. Now, the CCP is violently enforcing a homogeneous culture.

                  Being so far away from 94 percent of the Chinese population, historically disinterested in being part of China, being culturally distinct from China, and being in a position to easily open ties with Europe and the Middle East, with a 3-thousand mile head start on the CCP, makes Xinjiang a natural third major target for a dictatorial government trying to consolidate power. China has already attacked the first and second targets, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Although Taiwanese industry, infrastructure and diplomatic ties progress beyond the CCPs control; Taiwan has their own military, a distinct culture, western ties, and are even recognized as a separate country, so the CCP does what they can to suppress and discredit Taiwan without a full-on invasion. Hong Kong has Western ties and a distinct culture, and a large, concentrated population, but no military, so the CCP has passed incredibly broad and vague retroactive “anti-terrorism” laws that allow them to forcefully invade and occupy Hong Kong and extradite any Hong Kong citizen for any reason from Hong Kong to mainland China, to be detained indefinitely without any appeal in court. How about Xinjiang citizens? Culturally and physiologically distinct from other Chinese citizens, geographically far away from the CCP, and in a position to expand their influence even as they call for independence, but no separate military, a relatively small population, and no significant ties to powerful countries. So the CCP labels them terrorists, invades them, destroys cultural buildings that define the uyghurs as obviously a different culture, throw at least 10% of the population into re-education camps(make sure the politicians and professors are among that 10%), limit their transportation and track all the rest of them.

                  If you look at more than just the number of ethnicities in China, it makes perfect sense why the CCP is persecuting this specific minority: for the same reasons they’re persecuting, Taiwanese and Hong Kong citizens, except the Uyghurs have less resistance capabilities.

                  Since you asked about the hui specifically, they are terrified of being attacked next, since there was no provocation or necessity for the concentration camps in xinjiang other than uyghur physiological and cultural difference. The hui, however, look more like Han Chinese and have not advocated independence from China, unlike the uyghurs.

                  As for the US interest in Xinjiang, yes, that ties directly into one of the reasons stated above the CCP is specifically attacking Uyghurs. Wilkerson explains how the CIA could destabilize the CCP through Xinjiang, but It’s just as likely that the US would keep military on the western edge of a hostile, powerful country as the US military does with other powerful countries (3000 US soldiers recently sent to the western boundary of Russian influence with directions not to engage). Not engaging, but there. Wilkerson says that Xinjiang is an easy entry point to China, which yes it is, a lot easier than anywhere on the east coast.

                  The energy artery is no longer as significant as Edmonds makes it out to be, with regard to energy developments and energy investments in the last decade in the east of China. She’s also agreeing that Xinjiang is an important region for the CCP with ties to other countries. That is why the CCP wants to control xinjiang completely and erase any trace of independence.

                  As for no cultural genocide going on, not being allowed to speak your language, forced to pledge allegiance to the CCP, not allowed to wear your own clothing, and the cultural buildings(at least 10,000 mosques so far) that have been destroyed speak louder than the lack of evidence you’re providing.

                  It’s fine if you don’t like the BBC, but their video is of a re-education camp detaining Uyghurs, created by China to culturally repress Xinjiang citizens, and the Chinese officials in charge of that particular camp admit the Xinjiang citizens may be detained without cause indefinitely. Whatever you think of the BBC, that’s what is being shown in that video sanctioned by the CCP of a camp sanctioned and exhibited by the CCP. Similar documentaries(often longer than the BBC News statement) are available by vice news and other news organizations.

                  Seems like whoever wrote that article you linked to just really hates that one BBC presenter and does nothing to discredit the actual content of the video.

                  As for zenz, your argument is that the cultural genocide against Uyghurs zenz claims hasn’t been disproven because his studies have been accepted. Which doesn’t address the fact that his studies have not been disproven.

                  I get that you don’t like Zenz, he seems bombastic, and I don’t care about him personally at all(data over tweets for me), but I don’t think that has a bearing on what the CCP is doing to the uyghurs.

                  Side note - what are you talking about with zenz being a day late? China announced covid-19 human transmissibility in January 2019 afaik, and that tweet is from May. Is that 5 month gap what you mean by “the day after”?

          • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            cultural genocide

            When there is not an actual genocide happening, but you want to smear a country as genocidal, smear people calling out your bullshit as genocide deniers, and when you don’t care about watering down the seriousness of claiming a genocide is underway.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Neoliberals in a Western Country: “We need open borders so a guy living in Mexico can come up to Alabama and pick all our vegetables every summer, earning below-living wage, because this is economically efficient.”

      Neoliberals in an Eastern Country: “Anyone not employed within five miles of their place of birth has been human trafficked.”

      shrug What do you even do with this?

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Truly an unexpected development. No, not unexpected…Expected. That’s the word I’m looking for.