A distinguished group of retired four-star generals and admirals from the U.S. military have argued in a brief filed in theĀ U.S. Supreme CourtĀ on Monday thatĀ Donald Trumpā€™s claims of absolute ā€œpresidentialĀ immunityā€ from criminal prosecution tied to Jan. 6 is an ā€œassaultā€ on the ā€œfoundational commitmentsā€ underpinning democracy and if his argument is allowed to succeed before them later this month, it threatens ā€œto subvert the careful balance between the executive and legislative branches struck in the Constitution.ā€

The 38-page amicus brief features 19 authors, all of them decorated retired admirals, generals or secretaries from branches of the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force respectively. On April 25, the high court is poised to hear Trumpā€™s question of immunity against prosecution for his alleged criminal conspiracy to subvert the results of the 2020 election. and according to the brief, these are arguments that should be approached with extreme caution.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Literally Tony Bobilinski at the time, and far right websiteā€¦ the washington post.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          The problem is it cant be used in court because that is a doubt they put into it. But the emails on the laptop were confirmed (see the far right washington post), and the contents were also confirmed by Bobilinski. And if you care about actual corruption and the truth then you should watch him talk before congress(?) and literally accuse them of crimes.

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            Ā·
            3 months ago

            No, it canā€™t be used in court because itā€™s bullshit. Some emails were confirmed but wildly different numbers each time. I do care about actual corruption and truth (hence why the laptop is BS, seriously did you even read where it said that?). The guy wanted the thing televised but the gop said no. Whoā€™s afraid of the truth now?