anon6789@lemmy.world to Superbowl@lemmy.world · 7 months agoKnock Knocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1317arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1316arrow-down1imageKnock Knocklemmy.worldanon6789@lemmy.world to Superbowl@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejohannesvanderwhales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·7 months agoLooks like a red bellied woodpecker and a screech owl.
minus-squareanon6789@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·7 months agoThat’s correct! You win the grand prize of your weight in owl pellets! For the audience at home, here is how you tell male from female Red Bellied Woodpeckers: And they do actually have a red belly, you just usually can’t see it.
minus-squarejohannesvanderwhales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·7 months agoAnd for people who think they should’ve been called red-headed woodpeckers, the name was taken.
minus-squareanon6789@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 months agoThe original does have more red so it’s deserved at least
minus-squarefederalreverse-old@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 months agoWhy not go for “redneck woodpecker” though? Granted, it does look a bit too elegant for that name.
Looks like a red bellied woodpecker and a screech owl.
That’s correct! You win the grand prize of your weight in owl pellets!
For the audience at home, here is how you tell male from female Red Bellied Woodpeckers:
And they do actually have a red belly, you just usually can’t see it.
And for people who think they should’ve been called red-headed woodpeckers, the name was taken.
The original does have more red so it’s deserved at least
Why not go for “redneck woodpecker” though? Granted, it does look a bit too elegant for that name.