Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post, thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      not necessarily/could be offset? openai is still in that ā€œweā€™ll set fire to money to make ourselves look goodā€ stage of VC dreamery; find entities operating on credits, slap there

      but possibly even in the case where itā€™s still straight transactional, it might be a net negative for them: revenue, actual usage, and still no meaningful shift on their product becoming good. itā€™ll just make them look even worse

      the bigger problem (to which this suggestion would most certainly contribute things getting worse) is that theyā€™re still burning other important resources. I donā€™t really have a good/clever proposal to this which isnā€™t something like ā€œwell, burn their DCs to the fucking groundā€ (or other more creative forms of invasive service interruption)

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        they will burn through that money pretty quickly and without turning profit, however this can contribute to one of their ratfucked metrics to go up, which could hype up some segment of stonk market. because now theyā€™re fueled by hype and vc money, any new thing that would sustain that hype would be a bad thing (adoption here, kinda, at least as seen through excel)

        i agree, 120mm mortar is much cheaper, faster, more irreversible, but openai going bankrupt and forced to sell their kit at least would generate less waste

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          forced to sell their kit at least would generate less waste

          and a net positive in terms of human happiness