nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前Game devs praise Steam as a 'democratic platform' that 'continues to be transformative' for PC gaming todaywww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square78linkfedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down111cross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.casteam@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1378arrow-down1external-linkGame devs praise Steam as a 'democratic platform' that 'continues to be transformative' for PC gaming todaywww.pcgamer.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前message-square78linkfedilinkcross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.casteam@lemmy.ml
minus-squarexePBMg9@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·1 年前Corporate tactic, very secret: Don’t self-destruct.
minus-squarehenfredemars@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 年前But if we don’t self-destruct, how do we create value for shareholders?
minus-squareJackinopolis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·1 年前No shareholders if you aren’t publicly owned. Stakeholders, yeah probably, but no shareholders.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前You can still have shareholders in a private company, those shares just aren’t traded publicly…
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前I would love to learn more about Valve’s actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world.
Corporate tactic, very secret: Don’t self-destruct.
But if we don’t self-destruct, how do we create value for shareholders?
No shareholders if you aren’t publicly owned. Stakeholders, yeah probably, but no shareholders.
You can still have shareholders in a private company, those shares just aren’t traded publicly…
I would love to learn more about Valve’s actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world.