• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re not, your playing this little game because you know you can’t defend your position.

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What game? I’m trying to game a serious discussion and help you make am ironclad argument so I can respond to it appropriately.

      Response to your comment below because your inability to understand the basics of debating combined with your need to constantly belittle anyone with a different opinion seems to have caused us to hit the thread limit:

      Hahaha for a guy who likes to take digs on the reading comprehension of others yours isn’t any better.

      You’ve got maybe half of it, that I’m asking for A because B but I’ve already explained why B is B. If you can’t understand than I guess you’re the one who’s gotta go back to 5th grade.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ll distill your circular logic. Hopefully it’s simple enough for you to grasp.

        You have to provide A (good white supremists) because of B (comparison between white supremists violence and Muslim violence is invalid) but I won’t provide evidence of B until you provide A.

        This is the game your playing because you don’t have evidence of B.