this never happened before, it’s also not happening ion my backup computer (same OS, xubuntu 24.04).

Message: get more security updates through ubuntu pro with esm-apps enabled, learn more about ubuntu pro <url here>

How do I get rid of it.

Ubuntu never advertised itself so blatantly.

    • sleepyTonia@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      Man… At this point we really should actively be telling people to stay the hell away from Ubuntu. This is some M$Windows levels of sneaky and borderline malicious behavior.

      • Vahtos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Ubuntu/Canonical is the Microsoft of Linux distros. It’s no surprise they were the choice for WSL.

        Ubuntu has been forcing decisions on users and embedding advertisements for a long time.

        Examples that immediately come to mind…

        • When that Amazon search was embedded into the app launcher search.
        • These sorts of self promotions.
        • Quietly installing snaps instead of debs when using apt install
  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    There is literally not a single useful comment here.

    You have packages from outside the official main repo, in the universe repo.

    You are using a stable Distribution so packages are frozen and need backported security updates.

    You dont get them for the optional universe repos, but if you give them a bit of money (or afaik Ubuntu pro is even free for a few devices) then they will also support these 3rd party packages.

    It is an optional service, they warn you that you use outdated packages, and offer a solution.

    I dont use Ubuntu and Snaps are crap, but this is totally fine.

    • yala@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Thank you for some much needed background information (and perhaps even some of Ubuntu’s justification)!

      There is literally not a single useful comment here.

      That’s a bit harsh 😜. Though, I agree the ‘f*ck-Ubuntu’-circlejerk is very present.

      It is an optional service, they warn you that you use outdated packages, and offer a solution.

      I guess it’s wishful thinking to argue that they should have included the security patches from the get-go.

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        they should have included the security patches from the get-go

        I dont know how Ubuntu does that stuff, but universe is community supported only. It is required for many normal packages, so yes you could say their service is not good enough but hey, its free Software.

        If you dont pay a cent you have like nothing to complain

        • yala@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          I’m very unfamiliar with Ubuntu, so I apologize for my ignorance. Is universe their AUR, COPR, OBS? I thought that PPAs were Ubuntu’s user repository.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            29 days ago

            This is what I dont understand too. No, it is for regular packages, not random 3rd party stuff.

            Those are made on Launchpad and available as PPAs, originally meant to be the first step, followed by having them approved to Ubuntus repos.

            • yala@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              So, would it be fair to say that their packages suck and they’re desperately fundraising money through ads in hopes of fixing it?

              • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                29 days ago

                No. You are using a stable Distro. This is how stable distros work.

                If you want upstream updates for all packages, use a rolling or semi-rolling release like Fedora, Arch, OpenSUSE, Gentoo, etc.

                • yala@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  But Debian does get security updates backported, right? Like, is Ubuntu actively preventing you from getting these?

        • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          If you dont pay a cent you have like nothing to complain

          Disagree. Trojans are totally free, and I feel I have plenty to complain about there.

    • merompetehla@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      29 days ago

      package ubuntu-advantage-tools is not installed, so not removed.

      I can however remove ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon, together with apturl: common and apturl software-properties-gtk.

      Should I?

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        Ah - that’s all I had to do to solve it on Ubuntu server 22.04. Maybe desktop is different, maybe 24.04 is different. You can try removing additional packages or following other instructions. I won’t post any links here, as I see different possible solutions and haven’t tried any other than the one above. Let us know what works.

  • EddyBot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Ubuntu never advertised itself so blatantly.

    Canonical advertising their products has been a thing on Ubuntu server motd for years

  • oo1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    because you chose canonical over debian.

    give stock debian a try

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Yeah. I finally switched and learned that what I loved about Ubuntu exists in Debian, without the extra nonsense.

  • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    As someone who stopped using Ubuntu since 2016 due to Canonical’s bullshit, what’s this “Ubuntu Pro” nonsense? Is there some premium track or something? If so, that’s disgusting and I hate it.

  • Montagge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    29 days ago

    I got rid of it by signing up for Ubuntu Pro. Doesn’t cost me a thing and keeps the security updates coming in.

    • yala@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      29 days ago

      How does signing up work? What do they ask in terms of your data (email, name, address, more)? I tried finding out myself but their website misbehaved for some reason.

      • Montagge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        29 days ago

        It’s been a while but I’m pretty sure it’s just an email for the Ubuntu One account. Haven’t ever gotten any junk mail from them so I don’t even remember which email I signed up with lol

      • yala@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        There’s also the herd mentality; i.e. peeps like to up vote something that has already been up voted and down vote something that has already been down voted. I was the first to up vote; with my vote it became +2 -7. So, since then, it has received 4 up votes and 6 down votes. Which is at least an improvement.

        The point I wanted to make is that there’s more to it. I wouldn’t simply refer to it as symptom of toxicity and call it a day.