• Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Poor guy:

    His health’s likely irrecoverably-fucked, now.

    NASA did a twins-study, with 1 up there, & 1 down here, to discern, better, the costs of being up there…

    there’s plenty of evidence: it eats your health.

    wishing him well…

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Stupid people down voting you, being in space has some very bad effects on the human body.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        One of the reasons we send people up there is to experiment on ways to mitigate the effects of long-term exposure to the radiation and micro-gravity.

        Micro-gravity also allows for biological experiments that are too costly or complex to achieve planetside. So not only is he testing protocols and treatments for long-term space travel, but he’s working towards therapies and treatments which become available to the earthbound.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s a real shame that they never got to install the centrifuge module on the Iss. It was supposed to be big enough for a person to fit in, and would spin to simulate gravity. The best way to mitigate damage is to remove the thing that’s damaging you. We don’t test how to survive radiation exposure by having people stand next to some plutonium and see how many jumping jacks stop them from getting cancer. We have protocols about how long you can be around radiation, and how fast you need to leave the area. Microgravity would be treated the same way: how long until it starts affecting your health, and what’s the minimum amount of rotational artificial gravity needed to stave off the effects.