The 14th Amendment to the Constitution bans anyone who ā€œengaged in insurrection or rebellion againstā€ the U.S. from holding office.

A Florida lawyer is suing Donald Trump in an attempt to disqualify his current run for president. Lawrence A. Caplanā€™s Thursday lawsuit claims that the ex-presidentā€™s involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot would make him ineligible to run again, thanks to the Constitutionā€™s 14th Amendmentā€”a Civil War-era addition aimed at preventing those who ā€œengaged in insurrection or rebellion againstā€ the U.S. from holding office. ā€œNow given that the facts seem to be crystal clear that Trump was involved to some extent in the insurrection that took place on January 6th, the sole remaining question is whether American jurists who swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution upon their entry to the bench, will choose to follow the letter of the Constitution in this case,ā€ the lawsuit says, also citing Trumpā€™s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. Legal experts say itā€™s an uphill battle to argue in court, since the amendment has hardly been exercised in modern history. ā€œRealistically, itā€™s not a Hail Mary, but itā€™s just tossing the ball up and hoping it lands in the right place,ā€ Charles Zelden, a professor of history and legal studies at Nova Southeastern University, told the South Florida Sun Sentinel.

archive link to South Florida Sun Sentinel article: https://archive.ph/1BntD

    • iBaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      The election was the most secure in our countryā€™s history, that is a fact, but Trump planted seeds of election interference in 2016, when he won, so there was no denying what his strategy would be in 2020 (and he started on it early in 2020). There were definitely people that voted fraudulently, but it seems the majority of them, that I have seen reported on, were Republicans (voting for dead family members,voting twice, etc).

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What does your first thought about the ā€œmost secure electionā€ even mean, and how do you prove it?

        • ASprigOfSage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          Ā·
          10 months ago

          Not iBaz, but itā€™s the fact that every state that trumps legal team tried to sue had to double, triple, or further check the ballots has made it the ā€œmost secure election everā€. Basically the recounts that happened in Florida with Gore v Bush happend multiple times when trump attempted to dispute the election.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      Werenā€™t most cases of election fraud in 2020ā€™s election committed by Republicans?

      Our governorā€™s son tried to vote for him even though he was 17. He was turned away and then came back later that day and tried to vote againā€¦

      Itā€™s always projection

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      Anecdotal data is wholly irrelevant when you have laws upholding the results and should have no bearing on convincing you of one or another thing.

      Yes, we know that every election has some fraud. A lot of it is unintentional and a lot of it has been perpetrated by republican voters.
      There were fewer than 475 cases of voter fraud found in the 2020 election. https://fortune.com/2021/12/14/trump-voter-fraud-investigation-biden-battleground-states-only-475-potential-voter-fraud-cases/
      https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/21/politics/fact-check-republicans-voter-fraud-kirk-hartle/index.html
      The ultra-conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation has recorded just 1.438 proven instances of voter fraud going back to the 1990s.
      https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

      There has been an attack on our country by a sitting president to destabilize the peopleā€™s trust in the principle element of democracy. It has worked extremely effectively as nearly everyone will now question how valid an election really is - the kernel of doubt has been sown. Yet there was zero Z.E.R.O. reason to question the results of the 2020 election.

      Trump and his allies had claimed there was voter fraud because the polls prior to the election indicated he was in the lead while the results of the election contradicted the polls. There was also the previously known and reported and anticipated timing of events where mail in ballots were counted in bulk at odd times. Everyone knew the votes would be counted in chunks and that one candidate would quickly pull ahead of the other. We even knew that a lot of republicans werenā€™t going to vote because it was already anticipated (for no reason) that the election would be rigged. As entirely fictional reports of voter fraud made their way through the zeitgeist, they grabbed onto these stories and presented them as fact with zero evidence to back them up (looking at you pillow guy). The cases were thrown out of court because the lawyers had absolutely no evidence to present to the judges.

      Anecdotal stories are irrelevant when the sitting president of the United States is known to have fucked this country over. Heā€™s an evil narcissist and anyone who believes him to be anything else is a fool participating in his intentional dismantling of our democracy for his personal gain and pleasure.

      You shouldnā€™t be ā€œthinkingā€ there wasnā€™t enough fraud to sway the election. You should know this to be 100% factually true just as you know it to be 100% factually true that the moon is a sphere. Whatā€™s on or inside the moon is certainly up for debate ;-)

        • oxjox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          10 months ago

          I havenā€™t heard about that but I would say so, yes. Can you share these stories?

            • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              Ā·
              10 months ago

              These things donā€™t really seem to be equivalent. The idea in the 2020 election is that there were illegal votes cast and votes illegally purged and that allowed Biden to win. The idea in the 2016 election is more on misinformation on part of Russia and other sources. One is aledging illegal votes while the other is aledging misinformation. Those are pretty different things. And your first link is just about a few Democrats who are concerned about the security of voting machines and want to strengthen said security.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      Yeah people werenā€™t voting for Biden they were voting against trump. Biden is lame. Iā€™m a democratic lol. I wish we both had better choices.