UKFilmNerd@feddit.ukM to movies@lemm.eeEnglish · 5 months agoSony Considers “St. Elmo’s Fire” Sequelwww.darkhorizons.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down14
arrow-up111arrow-down1external-linkSony Considers “St. Elmo’s Fire” Sequelwww.darkhorizons.comUKFilmNerd@feddit.ukM to movies@lemm.eeEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoIdk, which is worse a remake or a delayed sequel? Or are they both on the same level?
minus-squareStereotype_Be@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·5 months agoThat’s a good question. I think I’ll take a sequel 40 years later over an awful remake that’s bound to change a lot of the original story.
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoI think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.
Idk, which is worse a remake or a delayed sequel? Or are they both on the same level?
That’s a good question. I think I’ll take a sequel 40 years later over an awful remake that’s bound to change a lot of the original story.
I think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.