• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the other guy’s comment is well suited as a response to this, so again I’ll copy paste:

    The theory behind why CSAM is illegal is that if someone is willing to pay for CSAM it incentivizes production of even more CSAM content to receive more payment. That incentivized additional production means even more abuse. A perfectly reasonable take and something that I think can be demonstrated.

    But why would you accidentally seeing CSAM prompt you to give payment to create that incentivization?

    How could reason possibly prevail when the subject matter is so sensitive?