• nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only other choice would be to break backwards compatibility, which is obviously not a good thing to do.

    There are other options. A version on html/css/js would be good IMO. Then you can remove things you should not use in newer versions or make other breaking changes and better evolve the standard. Yes the browsers need to implement and understand each version. Much like how rust works with its editions.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This increases complexity a lot, since you don’t just have to implement compatibility with the editions etc., but also have to properly test a giant amount of cases against all of them. What is the advantage compared to marking things as deprecated?