Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agoSarah Silverman and other authors are suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement, alleging that they're training their LLMs on books via Library Genesis and Z-Librarywww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.mlchatgpt@lemdro.id
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkSarah Silverman and other authors are suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement, alleging that they're training their LLMs on books via Library Genesis and Z-Librarywww.thedailybeast.comArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.mlchatgpt@lemdro.id
minus-squarenothacking@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year ago if asked by a user prompts chatGPT to summarize a copyrighted book, it will do so. So will a human. Let’s stop extending copyright law. Also, how you know it read the book, and not a summary of it, of which there are loads on the internet?
minus-squareSpaceToast@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThis is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work. Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.
minus-squareAndrewZabar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.
minus-squareSpaceToast@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI don’t know how anyone can be anti AI. It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense. Can you provide an example?
So will a human. Let’s stop extending copyright law. Also, how you know it read the book, and not a summary of it, of which there are loads on the internet?
This is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work.
Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.
I don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.
I don’t know how anyone can be anti AI.
It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense.
Can you provide an example?
Just wait and see.