octavio_dingus@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoJustice Samuel Alito Insists Congress Has No Power To ‘Regulate’ Supreme Courtwww.huffpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down11
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkJustice Samuel Alito Insists Congress Has No Power To ‘Regulate’ Supreme Courtwww.huffpost.comoctavio_dingus@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squaremriguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoIt would be evil and unethical, yes, but not unconstitutional. They would still be justices right up until their execution, so it’s still a lifetime appointment.
minus-squareAPassenger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoIt could still run up against tue 8th Amendment, more specifically the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Edit to add: being convicted of a capital crime does not guarantee a death sentence. Anything less than death still bumps into a Constitutional issue. Coming and going, there’s a likely Constituional challenge. An amendment would almost be easier.
minus-squareAlien Nathan Edward@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agodeath penalty isn’t cruel or unusual. scotus said so themselves. they even said a punishment could be cruel as long as it isn’t unusual.
It would be evil and unethical, yes, but not unconstitutional. They would still be justices right up until their execution, so it’s still a lifetime appointment.
It could still run up against tue 8th Amendment, more specifically the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
Edit to add: being convicted of a capital crime does not guarantee a death sentence. Anything less than death still bumps into a Constitutional issue.
Coming and going, there’s a likely Constituional challenge. An amendment would almost be easier.
death penalty isn’t cruel or unusual. scotus said so themselves. they even said a punishment could be cruel as long as it isn’t unusual.
My other comment addresses this.