Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Canā€™t Be Copyrighted::Matthew Allenā€™s AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it canā€™t be copyrighted because itā€™s too much ā€œmachineā€ and not enough ā€œhuman.ā€

        • sapient [they/them]@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Depends on how radical weā€™re talking.

          On the less radical side - UBI, donations, contracts for creation of art that people want even if itā€™s not copyrighted afterward, Convenience Factor (often used by FOSS projects), and also the fact that a lot of art is created and intended for free redistribution anyhow .

          On the more radical side: re-examining our entire concept of work and labour and rent, decentralused gift economies, automation, the destruction of capitalist structures as a whole, etc.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      That would be great in the fully automated space gay commune, until then though we donā€™t want artists to starve.

        • ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          For some reason a lot of the Internet relates communism with homosexuality. I think maybe because heterosexual people established capitalism? Idfk

          • berg@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            I guess just homophobic slander? To be fair I read it as a ā€œspace joyful communeā€, which seemed to make most sense. Giving it the benefit of the doubtā€¦