
Depends on how we define honest “person”, no? Why judge their honesty by the last thing they said?
Depends on how we define honest “person”, no? Why judge their honesty by the last thing they said?
Yep, I don’t like it either. But I think editors often suggest a subtitle to a book to make it more appealing to the mass, it could be what’s happened here.
I don’t know if you can have a signature on Lemmy posts, but this could be y’all signature
Do you know any good Usenet guide out there? The ones I found were confusing, I don’t even know how to start really
I think it could be productive to not think of him as dumb, but as being taken advantage of by people with their own interests in mind. We are all humans and it’s easy to see the other as different, but I think we are way more similar than we are distinct and as a relative, coming at it with empathy and maybe humor could bring the heat of the conversation down a couple of notches. Anyway it kinda worked for me I think, so take it with a grain of salt.
This is just classical conditioning for me at this point : I see “free update” and I just want to give money to the devs.
Were the US Republicans deluded and out of touch too? In fact, who was not deluded or out of touch?
Well that’s exactly what I did, so obviously it didn’t work for you, but substitutes absolutely did it for me. Don’t know why you’re so incredulous.
I’m able to make a false analogy too : It’s kinda like training wheels on a bike. It makes the experience of biking easier for the one learning and eventually you can remove them.
Yeah, but what if they’re not loaded with methylcellulose, or what if we do eventually come close to the real meats or what if this is a gateway product that could convert carnists?
We thank you for your service
I heard it was a strand of bofadees
Are there ongoing atrocities committed by China? Yes. Committed by the West? Also yes.
Your original comment is unclear or unnecessary, I think that’s why people are confused.
Except maybe cholera
“cleared by polygraph” sounds a little like “cleared by his horoscope”
I get that, but am I wrong?
Exactly, it’s the fourth forbidden one, it helps with debunking theist views for instance
Such a genuinely good reductio, I’m stealing this!
I disagree, it was fun TV to me and I love this genre; also liked Monk, Psych, Poker Face, Ludwig and others