I’m at an event right now that involved thousands of people queuing to check in with carts of gear in a large hotel atrium. One person walked by with their cart and a stupid JBL Bluetooth speaker blasting music. The main character syndrome some people have is insane.
That’s just like Zuck to copy yet another idea.
Some instances are hosted and paid for by people that don’t have lots of money. Purging old posts to save costs is a valid reason to do so. Whether or not that’s the case, I have no idea.
It sounds like if Trump sues you for anything at all, if you can tie it back to his finances or Epstein files, he will drop the claim. I hope companies and wealthy non Trump supporters are taking notes.
Nobody hates Latinos quite like Latinos.
You make it sound like it would be a bad think if the perpetrators got shot and killed for their hate crime. They deserve no better than an untimely end to life.
Hopefully at the very least it costs a stupid amount of money and is painful.
Plus they have a built in functionality to detect and skip creator ads. Not that if they were actually legally responsible for blocking those that this would be an acceptable solution, but they aren’t, so this is a consumer bonus.
I hate that I’m defending Google here, but I agree the lawsuit is frivolous.
Ianal, but I believe laws like this usually have a “reasonable expectation” component to them. Imo, ad free means Google isn’t injecting their own ads before or during videos, with the exception of ads during live events. I believe they have lived up to that and more with the built in functionality to detect and skip creator ads. I think the explicit writing in the ToS further defends their position, but by itself isn’t a definitive defense. So I think the prosecution has to somehow convince a judge that they were actually deceived by the whole package, the marketing and defend against the very clearly stated section in the ToS. That to me is a tall order and I think Google wins.
It is if you ignore the fact the the other option was going to be way worse.
Except that they are treated differently than other people. It’s important to highlight the victories to support the movement and further bring attention to it. Were you also an “All Lives Matter” person?
Mine are thicker with deeper ridges for max floss.
You said she’s never been paid. It’s okay to concede you were wrong, and then state the fact that it took so long is a travesty. Just doubling down on a different argument entirely is moving the goal posts.
I put thinly sliced purple onion on my burgers. It adds a mild onion flavor I like and extra crunch. Pretty much the opposite of your opinion.
A couple octives lower, less strings, but still poop.
It’s just so unlike him and the party.
Gay sex isn’t about reproducing. I could see outer course being one of those things that seems completely implausible to me but actually happened. I’ve been surprised by historical sexual documents I have seen in the past, thought this may be one of those times.
He would be in charge for as long as it takes for the first person to get in arms or bullet length of him. A light punishment with huge upside for both parties.
They say that a good compromise is when both parties are dissatisfied. I feel like this is one of those “exception to the rule” situations.
It’s much harder to get hit by a vehicle inside, so yea, probably kids playing outside.