Nah, icicles are occasionally sharp…

I’m going to start calling them Tesla hatchbacks.

Considering that a US hospital will charge you a few grand for even looking in their direction these days, $2,500.22 for something serious, like seizures, sounds like a steal :(

Ideally, it would be the same word over and over, so that we can trick the AI into ending all sentences with the word. Bonus points if it is the word “buffalo”, since it can from a grammatically correct sentence.

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Damn, has it been that long already!?

That’s the ‘soon’ I was referring to, I guess. He’d been working on another game in the same universe when he got the rights back.

Mentioned in this thread.

And I believe the designer got the rights back fairly recently, so I’m hoping for more of this!

Which ever episode it was were the main love triangle chick flipped her car in broad daylight on a mostly empty road with no traffic.

I realized that almost none of these characters would have survived the initial outbreak.

I’ve had a lot of fun with Book of Demons, which is a bit more simplified, but really respects whatever amount of time I have to put into it!

Or worry about all of the asbestos, lead, and formaldehyde -laced building materials that were all of the rage in previous decades.

The only things in that range around these parts are going to be burnt out husks of a house with a cheery “fixer-upper” in the listing title…

Doesn’t matter how similar it looks though.

The only way to tell is to open up both models and look at individual points of the 3d mesh. If their positions in 3d space match up to, say the hundred-thousandth of a decimal, then it is a copy.

But if the model was scaled or rotated or whatever, there would be no way to prove a case because there wouldn’t be a match.

The same thing was done to prove games was lying about copying models from previous games when they claimed that it was too difficult to add all previous monsters into different games because their converter tool was giving them issues.

Did they say how they analyzed the models? Because looking at the silhouette and other similarities isn’t enough to prove plagiarism when it comes to 3d models.

What you have to do is open up both the original and the suspected copy models and select a couple of similar vertices (the points that give the model geometry) and compare the position down to the decimal place. If they are even a little off, then it isn’t a copy.

It’s worse because they are a suicidal death cult.

They wish to bring about their version of the end of the world and are doing everything they can to make it happen. All the while, they are dragging the rest of the world down with them.

Didn’t even have to be the US.

Israel has been known to threaten US politicians with financially backing their political opponents unless their Zionist line is toe’d.

God forbid Federal Highway Administration or the Department of Transportation actually work on removing distractions along highways…

Ah, yes on the first count at least, though that criteria wasn’t on your bulleted list, I guess it was in the title.

That being said, UV breakdown might not be as concerning in the short term if the substance is removed fairly often. I wonder if a clear gelatin or glycerin layer would last long enough?

I’ve also seen resin-infused paper-like substrate layers of material like carbon fiber attempt to bypass the requirement of an FEP. Each print layer was a new sheet and once the print was done the un-cured material was blown away.

Technically, I believe Mercury fulfills those requirements.

Otherwise, maybe something like Glucose?

There are a few substance here that meet that density: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/liquids-densities-d_743.html

But, as far as resistance to UV and immiscability with UV resin, testing would be required, as I’m assuming you intend to replace the FEP film layer with a dense liquid.

Honestly, if I’m seeing more than say two or three currencies or kinds of bits to keep track of, it’s a no for me. I don’t care how much I’m in love with the concept.

Mainly because I don’t have the available real estate at my place to break out every other War & Peace- worth of board game, but especially if it looks like the setup time is will take longer than playing an actual game.

So I think I might have figured out what’s going on here.

You have a cube you are baking to when you have the ‘enabled selected to active’, yes?

Try adjusting the values to match what your geometry is doing between the two cubes if that is the case.

The ‘Extrusion’ value will grow your selected object by that many units before the bake.

The ‘Max Range’ value will determine how far past that extruded layer it will look for geometry to render.

If your target cube is pretty close in size to your sculpt, it shouldn’t need much changing. But, if parts of the sculpted geometry intersect your target cube, you might generate artifacts in the bake like what you are seeing.

If that still isn’t working, try skipping the ‘target object’ option all-together by changing ‘Space’ to ‘Object’ and plugging in a ‘Normal Map’ Node into the ‘Surface’ slot of the ‘Material Output’ Node of the sculpted object’s material shader.