Man kann es ja mit den kleinen Hügelwärtern ja machen.

Ja mhm dann dürfte dies besonders schwer ins Gewicht fallen. Diese fehlende Interoperabilität durch offene Formate.

It’s easy to flip flop when you don’t have a spine or are snide.

Es ging ihm nie um den Profit, er wollte einfach nur ins Fernsehen.

RIP Peter.

They really outdid themselves with that cover art :D

um C.L. zu zitieren: Haha, Nein.

this seems wrong.

https://xkcd.com/936

Die Entropie erhöhst du mit Länge, denn ein Zeichen ist ein Zeichen. Nur bei Wörterbuch Angriffen sind Zeichenklassen interessant.

Oops dann hab ich das glaub ich mit der anderen Office Suite verwechselt. Sorry.

Only Office ist kein FOSS.

Und Collaboraoffice ist halt auch nur LibreOffice bloß gehostet, wodurch die Kompatibilität zwischen Nextcloud und LO besonders gut sei.

Tjoa schade SPD. Damit seid ihr völlig bedeutungslos geworden, genauso wie die FDP.

CBS does plan to offer its own form of live fact-checking — but it will be online, rather than directly from the moderators, via its CBS News Confirmed Unit journalists in an online blog.

So the attention of the viewer is divided or they don’t even know that there is an online live fact check.

Sounds more than fishy

Yeah have a good one as well.

I would not be qualified to talk to Hirst or a dead painter. They would have to take it with the Copyright law.

Or that

Threshold of Originality.

In the case of someone saying I want a song that is ABAG, and they ask that it be written down because they cannot write it down themselves

Then we are again in a commissioner situation. The guy who commissioned a composer to write them a song according to their specifications.

In regards to your bucket of paint.

That’s an art installation which you can copyright. The resulting artwork on the canvas can’t be.

Gatekeeping? Nah, it’s not as it’s quite easy for AI Bros to pick up a pencil. Nobody, except disabilities, stops them.

And yeah AI slop has become so well that rabid people are accusing actual artists that their art was made by AI. But why is that? Certainly not because their previous art was trained on…

Fuck AI. It is used to replace actual humans and human creativity.

Let’s look at music. If a musician loses their arms and can no longer play an instrument, but instead dictates the chords to someone else to play, who is the artist? Who can claim ownership of the piece?

Then that musician becomes the composer who can copyright the sheet music. The one who plays the chords becomes the performing artist and can copyright the performance.

Spoken like someone who has never used an LLM before and thinks it magically produces exactly what you want on the first time, every time.

I have used LLMs extensively, several versions and types. I know how that shit works. And no I do not think that its results are deterministic and accurate.

Mine is that the tool is the LLM, and that when art is created with it, it should be open to copyright.

The LLM is the “artist” as it produces the image. And you can’t claim copyright for someone else.