• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2024

help-circle













  • MostRandomGuy@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlBSD Vs. Linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    The best argument is that me and lots of other people use it successfully as a daily driver without any problems, because we obviously don’t lack certain skills you may do.

    Your argument is totally random`and makes no sense, you could also claim that Linux is only for servers because its mostly being run on those compared to its Desktop usage and Windows or MacOS on Desktop systems, but you don’t, right?

    Linus Torvalds himself doesn’t like Desktop Linux, although he uses Fedora, but that doesn’t make it any less justified as a Desktop OS, no?

    OpenBSD comes with the possibility to run Xorg and you can install programs with GUIs like Webbrowsers, LibreOffice Suite, etc. And the performance constraints due to it being hardened can be untightened if you want or need to. You’re literally making things up here.






  • MostRandomGuy@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlBSD Vs. Linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thats when you’re out of arguments, ladies and gentlemen.

    The equivalent of facebook boomers reacting with a laugh emoji.

    But seriously: several people in the BSD community use OpenBSD on the Desktop, Theo De Raadt also does in contrast to a lot of FreeBSD devs that use MacOS as a daily driver.

    Don’t know why you’re so full of yourself when you clearly have no expertise on the subject.


  • MostRandomGuy@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlBSD Vs. Linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. OpenBSD is an absolutely legitimate Desktop OS and has no special use case. Its hardened and comparably slower than Net- and FreeBSD, but thats it . Guess you’re an “expert”.