
Harvard(?) has done studies that the odds of successfully choosing a candidate via the standard interview process is no better than picking names out of a hat.
Harvard(?) has done studies that the odds of successfully choosing a candidate via the standard interview process is no better than picking names out of a hat.
Oh, shit, you’re right - exactly what I do.
It’s why OneNote has been a blessing/curse for me.
There was a time when Foldershare enabled you to share folders across the internet without any Microsoft services.
Then they bought it and killed it.
I don’t see that case in the post?
Man, I can feel the quiet.
You can hear the crickets and frogs. The wind through every blade of grass.
Yea, Bogie could be a bit everyman, a bit hard-bitten, a bit suave, a bit hustler, depending on the role. Even in Casablanca he’s just trying to get by, make a buck, and not get shot as a collaborator. He’s not “the man”, he’s a man. And as I think about it, the characters would’ve lived through WWI - that would make you tough enough whether you served or not.
He did a lot of stuff like this such as “To Have and Have Not”.
And Huston was an important/influential director from the era.
Can you send links to the previous tickets?
Complaints have trended in the opposite direction, I’d say – without a case, some phones can be so thin and slippery that they’re hard to grip securely.
PLASTIC is the answer. Give me a plastic-backed phone like my S4 had, something with texture. I have a 4 year old Moto with a plastic back and I have no problem gripping it without a case. And it’s really thin too.
Also, bring back some interesting designs like we had in the mid-late 2000’s.
Find a book (ha!) on ADHD in adults.
Check out How to ADHD on YouTube. I’ve always found it humorous how the very structure of her videos is targeted dead at people with ADHD: she well understand how to keep your attention.
Captain fucking obvious needed to do research to figure this out?
And you wonder why people have poor views of things like Humanities.
This was obvious in 2000.
Yea,this could be useful research, if the intent is to quantify it for other researchers to use. But even this very article suffers from the very click-bait they’re talking about.
Hence motor-cycle? 😁
Bookmarks are problematic.
The page can go away, or be changed.
Damn, must be nice to have enough working memory to do this! 😁
Neat idea, though, I’m sure many people can use this.
I forget - wasn’t there a change to the scoring system recently (last 10 years?) because Gleason was too ambiguous, or was Gleason the new model to address the scoring limitations?
I don’t think for prostate treatment necessarily does. In Biden’s case, he’s been declining for years - it seems like mortal disease comes on the heels of major cognitive decline - sadly I don’t think he’s going to live much longer, and it won’t be prostate cancer that gets him.
Also, most men will get prostate cancer if they live long enough. The approach has changed in recent years, to only treat if it’s growing too fast or you get it very young (because it normally grows so slowly you’ll die of old age first).
Interesting.
Seems again, that this won’t affect enterprise systems because of things like user rights (users don’t run as admin) and GPO that controls the AV.
No admin, it’s not getting changed. GPO means even as admin, it probably takes an additional confirmation.
If it gets past both of those…
For the average home user, this is why you don’t run as admin. That’s 98% of the reason you don’t see stuff like this on Linux: defaults have the initial user account not have root - you setup a root password during install, and a separate user account.
Start with one thing you want to do, the most important thing.
Enumerate the requirements of that thing (machine to host it on, the kind of OS it requires, network connectivity, etc).
You’re doing what I’ve always heard as “solutioning” - getting overwhelmed with potential solutions before clearly identifying the problem (e.g. Requirements).
Solve that first thing, then move on to the next thing.
Odds are you can get started with something much simpler than jumping feet first into solutions like Proxmox (which has nothing to do with your stated goals, it’s a storage/redundancy/virualization system). Forget about all that - if you eventually come to a point where you need those capabilities, you can deal with it then.
I would start with redundant local data and a cloud backup. Three local drives with data sync’d or mirrored is much easier/cheaper to get going than spending time setting up a NAS that you don’t know you need…yet.
Or, if you know you need a NAS, then start there and get that established, stable first. Then start your sailing efforts. Pretty much all NAS solutions today support some kinds of virtualization/containerization. I don’t recommend Proxmox as your start.
Edit: I’ve run different flavors of Linux on a laptop for this, with an external drive that got sync’d to a second external drive and to a third external on another laptop. That mostly protected me from local/drive/system failures, at least.
You can always add your own router between the cable company and your network. This is, after all, what the entire internet looks like.
I currently have 2 routers downstream of my cable modem, because I had them and it was easier than setting up a business class router.
Since ZFS keeps the config info on disk, I’m with another commenter wondering about your disk health.
Check the SMART data for each drive.
Butter… You monster! 😁