Rusty Shackleford

deleted by creator

This problem is a problem of the Democratic Parties Party’s own making.

quit while there they’re ahead

Surely we must all learn from you, an infallible saint, who has descended from on high to become a paragon of virtue, and, by the way, totally watched the stream being discussed.

Why, someone of your holy mandate would never be caught morally posturing self-righteously on the internet solely on hearsay and bias!

I watched that stream live.

He went to bathroom, announced beforehand, and his camera man fucked up and went in with him to bathroom, while he went into a stall for a number 2. The camera guy realized his mistake and walked out of the bathroom fairly quickly.

That incident isn’t the way you’re making it out to be.

In my opinion, the US federal government can/should be able take over Boeing temporarily in cases of felony or federal offenses perpetrated by executive personnel for the duration of the criminal investigation and trial.

There’s just too much potential for graft grift.

they could have kept literally everything else the same

The literal sense of what you’re saying is implied since it’s not a figure of speech or hyperbole.

You can just say you don’t care. The “literally” isn’t necessary.

College dropout and late registration are far superior.

I wonder if there’s an inverse relationship between an institution’s size versus its competency.

But come on.

Unironically, no u.

You ooze self-righteousness.

On a side note, you need more beets and less Schnapps.

deleted by creator

As is tradition.

• Fucking Morons

This venn diagram is Removed by moderator.

I suppose in Dutch, it would be “een holocaustje”.

I imagine that our (U.S.) government’s case resides primarily on the premise that the state may exercise the ability to force divestment of a company with foreign ownership.

These powers are granted by the National Defense Authorization Act which seeks to prevent imminent national and private security vulnerabilities being exploited by foreign adversaries and agents; the actors here would be specifically the CCP and their intelligence and military apparatus’ shell companies and PMCs.

The precedents set by U.S. Anti-Trust laws support their position, but the primary argument in the state’s defense are the powers granted by the NDAA.

I’m only speculating.

Conversely, a matriarchy doesn’t automatically imply a more moral and meritocratic society.

Women are just people and subject to the same human flaws as men are, especially in matters of resources, power, and influence.