This and the chicken presentation are my favourite pieces of academic work https://youtu.be/yL_-1d9OSdk

A cardboard box (and put something in it so the parents won’t look at you funny)

I polled the family, the all say it’s a pig. End of discussion

I’ve spent some time reading the Wikipedia article looking for the relevant part, I guess I was 10 mins early (didn’t get the chance to see your comment before that). Here’s the (probably) corresponding video, the first video result when searching for the freestyle javelin technique, in case it helps anyone: https://youtu.be/52rvqtiBoow?si=RiLjhJG2ttv-0s1W

I don’t know why this was also my exact same first thought

Next to upvoting, I’m just writing this to potentially get your comment ranked higher for this post.

I may be missing the point, but why not instead list names in whatever order, but clarify who contributed what.

I’m a manager, and this strip nicely brought out my main insecurities about the role. Thanks for pointing out that there are other things one may contribute with, despite losing (or never having) abilities in the three mentioned aspects. It’s not easy to let go of depth, and exchange it for width and longer term thinking.

These days I’m highlighting one or two keywords per paragraph, so people who get scared by my extensive writing get to have some non-scary starting points. They say it’s appreciated, but I’m still not sure how much is actually read…

Maybe to add, after having read some of the linked comments, that the survey is cool and all but that’s it. It triggers people to explain their process of how they tried to spot things (as good experiment participants should), but I have only seen one comment on the purpose and methodology (as a researcher would). For whatever interesting research question, the data selection doesn’t allow for insightful answers. We can interpret these results as we want, and as we can see, people are already taking what they want from it. Sincerely, Reviewer 2

I got a 9, while even knowing the two examples in this post, marking way too many as AI generated. But it got me thinking, seeing the deviantart links for the non-AI images: though maybe those are not generated by single prompts, there is a chance of heavy AI involvement in the process, one way or another. So I would actually be curious what the practical/applicable purpose of the survey was.

I’m kind of waiting for the pteranodon to appear there…

Are they still called footnotes if they take half the page? (I prefer parentheses though)