Cashiers in shambles
Nietzsche and out of context excerpts, you can’t possibly name a better pair.
It isn’t bad, it’s just the type of answer you’d see on reddit. I don’t know what i’d do, frankly.
Call as many political scientists and scholars as possible
This is the most reddit answer
clash royale
Holy hell I was straight up addicted once, then the devs ruined it all…
Holden is nothing more than an angsty privileged teenager who is angry at the world
While that is true, you do have to consider that he is
still devastated from his brother Allie dying.
I have no clue as to how that book got so famous. Ernest Cline writes like a redditor…
I once read an article praising the 1913 edition of the Webster’s dictionary and I have been using it ever since (in the form of GNU Collaborative International Dictionary of English). That with etymonline makes the reading experience quite pleasant.
Thing: :|
Thing, China: >:(
The project is fully open source; albeit the codebase is quite large.
When is this getting added to the criterion collection
Retroarch and tons of roms. Would set me up for quite a while.
I really appreciate the flexibility of lemmy when it comes to the viewing experience, you can browse it through the web, through dedicated apps, through RSS feeds, &c. &c. This is the kind of openness, of choice and software, that I desire for every service on the web.
Reminds me of Crackers in Pink Flamingos. Hilarious film, do check it out.
I don’t think the disposition to evil needs a “fertile soil”. For instance, there are evil men in convents–and in quite a high degree too–that harm others in order to break the monotonicity of their life; now, would you say a convent is a “fertile soil” for growth of evil–should be the contrary. The artificial spite is a product of, as I’ve mentioned, a boring and monotonous life, and it so happens the easiest mode available to break this is harm towards others.
In case of natural malignity, the influence on the actions lies not in something mundane as boredom but other natural causes–be it from parental abuse, &c. but I concur that I’ve no scientific knowledge in this field. And, thus I believe that the ones that hold malignity through nature (in contrast with the artificial one) are able to create an environment that accomplishes, or perhaps, breaks, as I’ve said above, their disorder’s whims. And the chans happen to be a pre-existing place with like minded people that nurture each other’s “seeds”, but even in the lack of these imaginary soils, the seeds will grow without any problem.
I apologize for some of my, perhaps, outrageous connections to metaphysics.
I don’t think such sites “produce” mass murderers; they certainly contribute to the accleeration of their extremity–I don’t deny that–but no site can “produce” mass murderers, there has to be some preeminent malignity present in the person.
Why is there so much fearmongering around 4chan? Everyone that doesn’t use it seems to think of it as an anomaly; when it is nothing but a somewhat “radical” (that too only some boards) social site. Also banning & doing something along those lines to the users of 4chan is the shittiest idea of all time.
without decreasing the size of your flock.
Read that as “without decreasing the size of your cock”
So the children have to pay for their father’s crimes? This isn’t really a justification, and they don’t not care, now they have a real reason for retaliation—starting the cycle of hate all over again.