

No? Just me then. How about this - 99% accurate COPD cough count…with a itty bitty convolutional model, on a $30 Adurino.
https://www.edgeimpulse.com/blog/ai-dont-like-the-sound-of-that-cough/
Why this might be cool. Different coughs correlate to different conditions (aka there is work going on in cough acoustics as a diagnostic signal / proxy for spirometry and breath sounds).
The above was trained on his coughs…it’s not far from there to “was that a healthy cough, wet cough, dry cough, wheeze? Is this a Blue Bloater or Pink Puffer?”
I’ve long suspected PoC (Point Of Care) systems could be adapted to use language models. Imagine - Qwen3.5-2B (with --mmproj) that lives on your phone…and you can point at mole or freckle and ask “hey…is this fucky or what” - and it actually KNOWS because it has access to DermNZ and can classify based on ABCDEs





I actually have a theory here…I think there’s a bare basement level that a model needs to be…anything above which, deterministic tooling can do the rest. We’ve just been yeeting into a black box.
Why that matters is this - if you can make a 450M model do what a 7B model does…that has a huge set of implications (see above examples), not least of which is for use GPU poors.
I’m doing some smoke testing on this idea right now for what I’m calling an ‘expert system’, where the model is treated like a squawk box and the infrastructure around it provides the brains (not RAG, per se. More like sidecars or tool calling). I’m liking what I see so far but there’s lots of fucking work to go. There may yet be a cheat code for some of the NVIDIA tax, if we take the work outside of the magic parrot :)