Removed by mod

This is just overwhelmingly false on just about every manner. Try getting your information from somewhere other than r/politics

The explanation is that I don’t give a fuck about race, and don’t consider disparate outcome to be an issue, nor a symptom of disparate policy. You’re the one who’s decided that race is what you want to obsess over. Not me

No, your obsession with race, and assumptions that everyone else just must be as obsessed as you is the only interesting thing here

We arent focused on skin color. You’re just the ones picking everything apart based on it, and acting like everyone else must be just as obsessed as you are.

Lmao tell me you’re just posting outrage without reading the article without telling me.

If you had been bothered to read before making a retarded quip, you’d notice that the rejection by judge was because the ballot measure was not specific enough, and was just meant to tack a bunch of stuff on such that it could get passed simply by being attached to a different issue.

If you don’t see why that’s not how things should run, I only assume you’re the one person on earth who isn’t a corrupt politician that just absolutely salivates over every god awful omnibus bill with hundreds of riders for random garbage

That highly depends on the individual.

Just declaring that everyone you disagree with has no values doesn’t make it so.

Lmao fuck off

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

As a frequent user of pcsx2, what’s the drama there?

Sure seems like a lazy way to dismiss the argument, just saying that he actually doesn’t know what he wants.

Because it’s the logical conclusion of mainstream pro-life rhetoric.

By what standard? Nobody genuinely believes that the “logical conclusion” of the mainstream “don’t murder homeless people” point of view must reasonably be a welfare state. Just because we don’t kill people, doesn’t mean they’re entitled to welfare.

At the very least, the way many of the pro-life policies are implemented cause direct and sometimes deadly harm to women.

And what would you say is the over/under on the amount of women who die as a result? And what does that number look like as a ratio to the children killed by abortions? Because at least from the numbers I’ve seen, it seems like an entirely trivial ratio to be putting at the front of concern.

There are times when abortion is medically necessary to protect women’s lives and we should allow them to make that choice for themselves

And you’ll find overwhelming support for abortion in those cases. Just as I can’t sucker punch some poor schmuck at the store and then just decide it was self defense because I wanted it to be, a medically necessary abortion actually has to be, well, medically necessary by some standards beyond “I want it to be”.

Because to reiterate, there are vanishingly few people who oppose any and all abortions, including in medically necessary situations, especially once you exclude the pedants arguing that those situations aren’t abortions by technicality, so therefore don’t count when they say they oppose all abortions. This is also where those stupid “80% of people support abortion” propaganda pieces come from. Almost everyone supports some form of narrow allowance, at the minimum, for abortion.

Removed by mod

Sorry, I was using the actual definition of a bribe, not your “everything he ever gets is a bribe” nonsense.

Don’t make up bullshit excuses to accuse people of corruption. Pretty simple stuff.

This article is just ragebait.

Great write up. Shame like 90% of the people here don’t care and would rather just continue to sling ignorant partisan hate

No, you’re just opposing freedom.