Winter_Oven

Hmm, interesting.

Oh no, twas a joke.

Although I didn’t know that copyright and patent were not the same.

Applies for a copyright patent for your face.

Gets it, now proceeds to sue you for violating my patent.

Hmm, pretty sure that’s a farad. A fraud is what you call the leaves of any sort of palm tree.

OK how am I suppose to follow this?

Ooh, what sort of graph is this? Reminds me of a fire graph, but I guess this is more like a river?

teehee :3

Let me tell you about Freetube, where it let’s you have a custom max limit of playback speed. I find myself sticking to 5x for the past couple of weeks.

Hmm, feels like this game is gonna get big.

Hmm, I wanna ask: what’s the funniest thing you’ve ever seen?

Well, pretty sure she doesn’t.

…wait, games don’t have even a single person checking for cheaters, even casually? Like, they wholly rely on anticheat?

(PS, has been a decently long time since I played a game that needed anti cheat)

Hmm, I would like to add on a couple of points to you reply (against your reply, now that I reread it):

1. I feel that he really was 100 percent in opposition against the movement, no?
2. About the movement, the creator of the movement also agrees that the movement can most probably not be applied to current games today, as it can be unfeasible for the exact same points you say, he wants it to be applied to future games being developed, by having the end of life of games be considered right from the beginning of games.
3. Moreover, about the legislative part of it, doesn’t a petition not need to deal with the exact legal wording? I belived petitions to be more like “hey, this is what the idea is, and this many people support it”. More like a letter to like actual law makers that this is a problem, and we need laws regarding this problem. Then the clear and robust arguments for each of the (very valid, of course!) problems and caveats you mention will need to be clearly articulated by them.

I’m sure the ADHD will ensure motion, regardless of one’s intent, thus there really is no problem in relishing sloth.

ooh, then I must have gotten the terms wrong…

What I was thinking were the free radicals that are generated during basically most oxygen related reactions in the body, I thought that was called oxidation (at least, in terms of the body).

So, you know anything about how (or if) antioxidants are used against free radicals?

Pretty sure oxidation plays a major role in aging, but can’t tell you the exact mechanism, I have no idea about it.

But about the blood rust idea, I don’t think that can work, cause we don’t have just iron particles that can directly interact with oxygen just floating around in our blood, we have a complex (I.e. hemoglobin) that contains significant amounts of iron, which somehow makes it really good for binding to and carrying oxygen.

Deviating a bit, carbon monoxide poisoning is really akin to suffcation iirc, cause it binds and occupies the hemoglobin, effectively reducing the amount of oxygen that can be carried by your blood.

However, do fact check me, I might be wrong about something…

Edit: BTW, it seems that “oxidation” might not be the right term to use here, so do understand that I am referring to free radicals here.

On the topic, as oxidation is a pretty prevalent negative side effect of living, our body has multiple mechanisms to deal with it, no? So my question is: where do the “antioxidants” that we can eat come into the picture here? Are they like preventing oxidation from even occurring, or are they like the shields that our cells use to protect themselves from oxidative stress, or what have you?

“Card Inserted.”

“It has been 11 years since this card has been inserted.”

"Deleting data…”

God, down to the exact number…

Same.

I would like to chime in and say that I too liked the color, and was unable to pick up on the reference.