No, but the moon does.
No, but the moon does.
the moon could get mad - fact.
Harry Potter and the Surprisingly Good Take
If you want a serious discussion of interpretations of quantum mechanics, here is a transcript of a lecture āQuantum Mechanics in Your Faceā which has the best explanation Iāve ever seen. Iād recommend the first 6 of Peter Shorās Quantum Computation notes (donāt worry theyāre each very short) for just enough background to understand the transcript.
I honestly think anyone who writes āquantumā in an article should be required to take a linear algebra exam to avoid being instantly sacked
Possibly the worst misunderstanding of quantum mechanics Iāve ever seen. I have no idea how anyone managed to convince themselves that the laws of physics are somehow different for conscious observers.
donāt mention skull sizes for 5 minutes challenge
Wasnāt Heidegger a Nazi, and his works famously avoid any mention of the Holocaust?
im doing my part
Dan Luuās āA discussion of discussions on AI biasā, about techbros trying to gaslight the rest of the world into thinking ML models donāt have problems
Why when we look into the stars do we not see a sign of life anywhere else? Has life not emerged yet or has it wiped itself out? With what? Nukes? AI? Synthetic viruses made with AI? Who knowsā¦
entertaining this awful sci-fi schtick for a moment - if every civilization is wiped out by āsuperintelligent AIā, how come you canāt look through a telescope and see signs of artificial life? in this fantasy world shouldnāt planets taken over by paperclip factories be even more conspicuous?
value is when line go up
Analyzing our data we conclude with 95% confidence that within a decade the Dyson Sphere Any% TAS time will be reduced below 55 seconds (Ā± 1E10 years).
ā[massive deficiency] isnāt a flaw of the program because itās designed to have that deficiencyā
it is a problem that it plagiarizes, how does saying āitās designed to plagiarizeā help???
The normal way to reproduce information which can only be found in a specific source would be to cite that source when quoting or paraphrasing it.
I thought Penrose was a smart physicist, the hell is he doing peddling this.
nvm i misread
deleted by creator
I donāt think itās very surprising. The various CS departments are extremely happy to ride the wave of easy funding and spend a lot of time boosting AI, just like how a few years ago all the cryptographers were getting into blockchains. For instance they added an entire new āAIā major, while eliminating the electrical engineering major on the grounds that ācomputationā is more important than electrical engineering.