• 1 Post
  • 659 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle












  • blindsight@beehaw.orgtoCanada@lemmy.ca*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Putting 2S at the front is part of Truth and Reconciliation, recognizing the intersectionality of being Indigenous and two-spirit and the importance of including Indigenous Knowledge across all systems of power.

    With all due respect, decrying their inclusion is racist and continues the perpetuation of colonialist systems of oppression.

    I say this coming from a position of immense privilege, as a white, cis male from fairly wealthy and educated non-immigrant parents.


  • Absolutely. STV is the dream system. Proportional representation but with fully local representatives.

    My favourite feature is that it holds politicians directly accountable to their constituents. If you don’t know much about politics, you can just vote by party, like regular ranked ballot. But if you know more, you can rank individual party members against each other in the same party. There are no “safe” seats party insiders can hold to assure being elected, keeping everyone accountable.

    MMP either has party lists (and its potential for corruption from seeking higher list rank from the party), or systematically over-represents areas with more fractured political views. MMP also can lead to more fracturing of parties, since you only need a very small percentage of votes to get 1 seat, instead of 20%+ (locally) to qualify for a seat in STV. We don’t need single-issue fringe parties holding the deciding vote(s) to get to a majority coalition government able to force a snap election at any time!





  • … he claims there is no point producing proof because they wouldn’t be believed.

    He also dismisses any evidence created by others as untrustworthy.

    What a load of shit. It’s up to the person making the claim to provide evidence. People have claimed the opposite, and backed it up with “low-quality” evidence. Refusing it would be pretty easy, if it were true; get someone independent to verify in a pre-funded, blind trial.

    The only reason not to do this is because they know their product reduces framerate frequently enough to be a problem.