It ““worked”” in France

It still kills most of the userbase when they do it

Normal people don’t know what a fucking dns is

You end up with 10 more new sites and a drop in quality and an endless game of cat & mouse

Removed by mod

Not comparable

It’s a matter of principle, pick any of hundreds of examples if you want a comparison

Again, not comparable

Some people

I never said “no matter what he did”

If convicted I don’t care

I just picked the first one when you google “media ruined life”

It’s a matter of principle

There’s hundreds of examples, pick your favorite

My hopes are low, let’s put it like that

But they were also pretty low for Robert Murat, so, I don’t like media vigilantism anymore.

Removed by mod

No I strongly disagree on giving psychoanalysis that much consideration

Besides the fact that psychoanalysis, new wave or not ; jung, freud, lacan, has only been demonstrated to work better than leaving the patient alone on a handful of illnesses and it’s still unclear whether simply letting patients talk and air out their problems could be the main driver of that.

It is fundamentally a discipline that is impermeable to science

I’ve never heard a student tell me they’ve read Watson or Rayner or any of the founders of CBT because scientific disciplines are centered around historical results and not authors. They know about Rayner’s results and it is enough, and if something better comes along later they’ll switch. No one is a Raynerist.

Psychoanalysis has gurus, and the beliefs themselves are built to be unverifiable

I’m tired of lecturers who tell you that if you treat someone with it, it’s proof that it works. And if the patient doesn’t respond to treatment it’s either the patient’s fault or they just need more time, and nothing is ever proof that it doesn’t work. And who are you to question <authority figure> anyway?

If they suddenly start publishing reproduced results in reputable journals that do anything other than being less effective than the current state of the art, then sure, let’s have them beyond history classes. Right now though? It’s a load of bullshit

I’ve had neighbors for 28 years and they’ve never been a significant portion of my problems. Largely nice, mostly indifferent, sometimes annoying

Being close to things, short commutes, no driving and not being lonely though?

Remove any of those and I’m instantly worse off

Not fun fact: 8 out of 10 shrinks in France use psychoanalysis

Only 1 university in the country excludes it from their care curriculum (history modules non-withstanding)

Only country in the world that hasn’t booted that practice off along with argentina

Yes

This is a Patrick Symmes’s article I read a while ago

https://www.patricksymmes.com/articles/publications/harpers/2010/thirty-days-as-a-cuban/

The data you listed comes from IHME, Global Burden of Disease but there’s nothing findable online as to how it’s actually gathered

I suspect they got it from the Cuban government

It’s not easy having a good nutrition in Cuba

The malnutrition stat is completely made up

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Mechanical_Turk

Watch out OP, big funny appreciator over here found your post sub par

I’d say it’s a non sequitur

Which is better in what way exactly?

You mean does the 80s-based protocol that doesn’t even support encryption support voice?

It doesn’t support having messages received while you were offline

IRC supports one and one thing only: N-wise chats to connected clients. That and delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Huge support for that too.

People who actually have sane standards for their instant messaging use the Matrix decentralized chat protocol when they need non-proprietary coms, or revolt

There’s got to be a new directive following this for the writers on those games: “Ensure the dialogue doesn’t matter”

How’s that gonna work?

Maybe not but could you get out of it for entrapment though?