- 0 Posts
- 411 Comments
2·6 days agoA perfect copy of you is you for all intents and purposes, otherwise I fully agree with your description.
Just use a formatter. It’ll show you that the second one is two statements:
{}(the empty block)+[]coerce an empty array to a number:new Number(new Array())
1·7 days agoGotcha. Given how the post we’re replying to is about Stonehenge, I guess I assumed that’s what you’re talking about
Just Stop Oil said the paint was made of cornstarch and would dissolve in the rain.
Merriman said experts cleaned the orange powder from the stones because they were concerned about how it might react to water.
Might.
So because it could in the future maybe possibly damage it in some unspecified amount, they cleaned it off to be super sure there will be no damage.
So what fucking damage that really happened in the real world are you talking about?
105·8 days agoThat’s the last three words of the article. The author didn’t miss the connection either.
I always wonder when people repeat something from the article or ask a question that’s answered in the article: did you not read it or did you just want to start a discussion about this connection and are somehow constrained in the number of words you can write per day?
14·9 days agoIt already dwarfed every other statistic before 2020, but sure, the last little bit was covid
2·10 days agoI see, that is strange!
IMHO fine:
- female doctor
- woman who is a doctor
IMHO weird:
- woman doctor
- a female who is a doctor
So it’s not a reversal. Using “woman” like an adjective is still weird!
In addition to what the other reply to you said, I was talking specifically about “female” as a noun.
“females like xyz” and so on.
I’ve never read any internet comment using “female” as a noun for human women that wasn’t problematic.
69·12 days agoI haven’t read anything this cursed in a while
Testing superscript syntax: 10-9
10^-9^
So this is how the furry subculture started
I usually write “POSIXy shell” but I thought that was clear from context this time.
The problem is that exit statuses !=0 aren’t treated as error by default (with a way to turn that off for individual expressions). Instead you have to set multiple settings and avoid certain constructs in bash/ZSH/…
Everything that works like a modern programming language by default is fine of course
Yeah, and that’s just one of many many things to consider.
As a long time former ZSH user, I’ll definitely include ZSH in shell languages to avoid for scripting.
The problem is simply the number of rules and incantations to slavishly include everywhere to make your script bail on error.
set -eis not enough by far.Python with plumbum or nushell are definitely better.
Oh you sweet summer child.
If you don’t use pipes or command substitutions,
set -egets you a fair part of the way there.If you’re interested, I can look up the rest of the arcane incantations necessary.
You’re right, of you have compete freedom, do that. If the place you want or need to go to is most comfortably reachable via rattlesnake road, bring boots.
In other words, if you don’t think the wasm landscape is mature enough to build a web thing with it, you are stuck with JavaScript, but you don’t have to rawdog it. I haven’t run in a single weird thing like this in years of writing typescript with the help of its type system, ESLint and a formatter.