What’s the alternative? Linux on phones is basically dead besides a few hobby projects that will never have enough of a following to be a serious contender to the duopoly
- 4 Posts
- 35 Comments
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Cities Panic Over Having to Release Mass Surveillance Recordings
3·4 days agoIt’s a sign of rot in our culture. People feel entitled to know everything about others around them. It’s the same mindset whether it’s trawling through security camera footage or stalking someone on social media or irl. Technology has accelerated the trend and reinvented voyeurism as a mainstream hobby
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Microsoft warns that Windows 11's agentic AI could install malware on your PC: "Only enable this feature if you understand the security implications"
16·4 days agoAt this rate we might finally see the year of the Linux desktop. I don’t know anyone who likes Windows 11 it’s been bad enough to convert even die-hard Windows fans to Linux
In what sense?
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Real Estate Giant Redfin Exposed Users’ Personal Info on Listing Contact Forms
1·5 days agoReal estate in general is a nightmare for privacy, especially for renters. You need to give a wealth of personal info about yourself and any references and it all gets sold, no data breaches needed! And your only opt out is don’t rent anywhere. And if you do anything to upset your landlord they’ll kick you out and add you to the blacklist so no other estate agent will consider you
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Flock Safety and Texas Sheriff Claimed License Plate Search Was for a Missing Person. It Was an Abortion Investigation.
2·9 days agoThis shouldn’t surprise anyone. Whether it’s companies, gov or cops they’ll spin any lie to get what they want
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Flock Safety and Texas Sheriff Claimed License Plate Search Was for a Missing Person. It Was an Abortion Investigation.
24·12 days agoShoot the cameras down
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•A perfidious trick? EU Council Presidency wants to introduce mandatory #ChatControl through the backdoor
9·16 days agoThey’ll never stop trying until it gets passed
I had a skim through the proposal and it sounds pretty solid. I do wonder though if the targeted advertising ban on under 17’s would push websites to do age verification like so many other places are doing
Not stupid, just uninformed. A lot of people are confused by how things like targeted ads work and because of that they just accept it as inevitable. They think “This website knows what I searched for on another website because it’s all linked. That’s how the internet works” and once you break down how the tracking is actually done, they realise it’s not infallible
It’s the same thing as people not knowing how planes stay in the air or what makes a car engine work. Nobody can be an expert on everything. I don’t mean to give you a lecture btw, I just think it’s counterproductive to dismiss people. But of course there are exceptions and some people just don’t want to know
How did you get into it? Any resources you’d recommend for a noob who wants to get into setting up servers?
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Security@lemmy.ml•Study concludes cybersecurity training doesn’t work
31·21 days ago(From the linked study, not the article)
Annual Security Training: At UCSD Health, each employee must complete a standalone security awareness training once per year (with the material designed by KnowBe4).
When employees first join, the HR system automatically assigns an employee this annual security training to complete within a few weeks. Once a user has completed their training, the system automatically reassigns this training to the user after one year (365 days) has elapsed
I haven’t dug very deep into the study to see what the training actually involves but this sounds like something employees would just bullshit their way through as fast as they can. I don’t think this proves that training in general is ineffective but that it needs to be made more engaging and interactive
I was talking to a friend the other day and she mentioned she’d searched for a product online and then started getting ads for it, and asked how often it’d happened to me. She was very surprised when I said never and I explained that I’d been using an ad blocker for the last 15 years. And by the end of our conversation I’d walked her through setting it up on her devices and now she’s one step closer to regaining her privacy
I often find people really aren’t happy with their privacy being undermined but they don’t realise there are things they can do about it. They’ll say things like “well it’s happening to everyone else too” as a coping mechanism but it’s not something they want. More education is critical
A lot of people really can’t grasp the concept of the status quo changing. Once tools are created and laws are passed they can be used for anything. It’s never going to just be the one purpose
I have a local network for sharing files between my devices but I don’t open anything up to remote access. I might change my mind once I’m more skilled at networking but right now I don’t trust myself to be able to set up something secure. If I’m on the road I just plan what I’ll need and manually sync it across before I go
freedickpics@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Someone Snuck Into a Cellebrite Microsoft Teams Call and Leaked Phone Unlocking Details
621·23 days agoWe do not disclose or publicize the specific capabilities of our technology. This practice is central to our security strategy, as revealing such details could provide potential criminals or malicious actors with an unintended advantage
Lmao fuck them 😂 the grapheneOS forum is exactly where this info belongs so the devs can patch any vulnerabilities. As if companies like cellebrite care if (other) malicious actors get their hands on the exploits. They just don’t want the the vulnerabilities to be fixed so they can keep using them
One thing that’s worth keeping in mind: physical retailers may have cameras, but they (in general) rotate their recordings and don’t provide an API for law enforcement.
They may not give law enforcement direct access but they absolutely upload and share their recordings with third party companies and other retailers. I don’t know how long they keep it for but storage space is incredibly cheap these days
IRL : I’d argue most security cameras are, AFAIK, on closed circuits. I don’t think they can upload the data somewhere nor keep it for a long time
It does depend. Most big retailers share CCTV footage with each other through a central company to build a profile on shoplifters (though I wouldn’t trust them to use it only for that)
Most online shop I know do NOT require a mobile phone number.
This definitely hasn’t been my experience though. I can’t remember the last time I saw an online retailer that didn’t require one, or at least require that the field be filled out. I suppose you could just enter a dummy number but then if there’s a problem with the delivery they’ll always try to contact you by phone first
I am sick of my contact details and my spending ability being considered fair game. You give them your money and that’s not enough they always want more.
Agreed. There was a time when only shitty free services did this (if you’re not paying, you’re the product!) but now every company under the sun wants to sell your data. If I ever buy something digital I always use a fake name/address/phone number and a gift card for payment. But with physical purchases it becomes tougher
As much as I’d enjoy getting to work with more Macs I don’t think workplaces will deploy them at scale for the cost alone