I hate how accurate that is

Flex and Gaylord.

According to USA Gymnastics Glossary of Terms

Gaylord:

On high bar, a front giant into a one-and-one-half front salto over the bar to regrasp. First done by U.S. gymnast Mitch Gaylord.

Hard to say what they mean by just “income”. Things like Per Capita Income just divide an area’s total income by its total population, meaning non-working adults, retirees, and kids with zero earnings are factored into the average.

Damn, that’s kinda fucked up. We all know there are (mostly) subconscious biases against people we find unattractive. But that’s harsh that it shows up as such a big gap.

There’s another dude I’ve seen that goes around and checks the safety of Flock camera installations and reports them the the Dept of Transportation.

Hitting one at speed might not be the best idea. He finds ton that are installed without being crash worthy (embedded straight into concrete).

Here’s a link to his stuff: https://youtu.be/SG8DwNqxz6E

“I’m being punished. So is my business. And, you know what, it’s worth it. The only thing necessary for evil to be done is for good men to do nothing.”

What a champion.

Thank you!

Can you provide any more info on the Waking Up app? My teenager has major anxiety issues and would love to have some more tools to help. It looks like a $20/month subscription, but isn’t clear what that entails. Is it like podcasts or what?

Archive link: https://archive.ph/fCNJm

Also, this article is over a year and a half old, so hurry up with the collapse already…

I think originally all post titles were literally just “rule” and then it loosened up from there

Yeah this was all great information for the years leading up to about 2022. I refinanced several times in the decade leading up to that. But now, interest rates are steadily rising. Gonna be hard for anyone to take advantage of refinancing for a lower rate.

I think the best system would be not to allow tariffs to be illegally implemented in the first place. But I realize that’s asking a lot.

ROFL even

That’s how my brother plays golf!

“I’d have par on this hole if I didn’t completely fuck up my first three shots.”

Unfortunately (or fortunately, probably) contract law doesn’t really work that way. If you sneakily change a contract or even verbally misrepresent what’s in that contract, it can be challenged in court.

It can be difficult to prove though. For example, if a car sales person verbally says your car payment will be $100 but the contract you sign says $1,000 then you can argue in court that they misrepresented what you signed and the $100 should stand. But it’s hard to prove what was said was different than what was signed.

Same concept if your landlord signed something, sent it to you to sign and you modified it to something else without communicating a change. If they can show the original document they sent you, you’re boned.

Yeah, but mrs_bereavement loves it.

And even then, it was looking at the time period between 1981 and 2002, before Citizens United kicked things into overdrive.

Yeah, I was saying the cheating being AI usage is what couldn’t be proven. They mentioned a few other possibilities like the tests being leaked or people working off camera with them.

But yeah, the cheating is obvious. And the likelihood of it being done by AI is damn near certain.

The headline kind of misses the main point, which is that the students have to retake the exam because cheating was so rampant, likely due to AI usage but that can’t be proven.

Between 2021 and 2025, 3.5 percent of test takers scored 100 or more on the 120-question UNAM test. This year, 16.3 percent did so.

The story was even worse at the highest of the high end. Between 2021 and 2025, 0.9 percent of test takers scored 110 or more; this year, 5.5 percent did so.

Wooden shoes beat furiously on cobblestone