

A. This is from 2022
B. Yes. Obviously. Anyone who doesn’t understand car-first culture is a nightmare has no business making policy decisions
A. This is from 2022
B. Yes. Obviously. Anyone who doesn’t understand car-first culture is a nightmare has no business making policy decisions
Did you mean “should” or “should not” because you wrote “should” but then I think you meant to say they should be nationalized.
I think Jane Jacobs figured this out in 1961.
There’s always foot traffic by me and I wouldn’t want it otherwise.
Now if we could get rid of on street parking and put in separated bike lanes…
For one thing, tech bros are stupid. They’re the kind of stupid where they think they have all the answers, and don’t know what they don’t know. So sometimes they’re completely sincere when they think they have a genius new idea (eg: a small private room where you can make a phone call. And maybe we can just put a phone in there, in case you don’t have yours charged or whatever. And then we can charge a fee. A phone booth. That’s a phone booth.)
But sometimes they do know the idea already exists, but they’re selfish, capitalist shit heads. They don’t want to make a better world. They want to make a profit. If they can run a “bus” service, drive all the other competitors out of business, and suck up all the money from a handful of people? That’s a win. That’s better than actually getting people where they need to go. People who live in out of the way routes? Fuck 'em, not profitable. People in wheel chairs? Not enough of them to justify the cost of making the buses accessible.
Alito is such a shithead I’m suspicious of anything he says.
Some other games use other terms. Like wod uses “storyteller”.
GM is the generic term
Are they going to keep voting for Republicans? Then they are really quite foolish.
Sometimes I ask them to give me a summary of the problem before the call, so I can have some context.
Sometimes if I’m lucky they’ll rubber duck themselves into a solution.
But sometimes it just helps me context switch to whatever they’re going to talk about.
The kind of scene where one person is excited to meet a fan and the other just liked the shirt can be so awkward and sad for everyone involved :(
But sometimes you make friends anyway!
I (~40 year old dude) had a similar thought when I saw this post. I like spaceslug a lot (and I’m wearing one of their tshirts right now!) but I don’t really know individual songs. Lemanis is a great album and Memorial has some good tracks, but names? Uhhh
I’m going to assume this is DND 5e, but this advice is system agnostic
Add objectives to your scenes that aren’t “kill everyone else”.
Add traps and environmental hazards to your scenes. Add enemies they can’t kill.
Add a third faction that has its own goals
They need to get books out of the library before it burns down, while the crazed wizard and his fire elementals are doing a ritual that’s going to make things worse for everyone.
The mansion is haunted, and this ball room in particular. Anyone who steps on the dance floor and doesn’t dance is accosted by angry ghosts.
The room is filling with water. There are a series of levers to control the water. There are priceless works of macguffin that will be damaged by the water.
Each egg host killed explodes into a mist of parasites, potentially infecting everyone nearby. Some enemies don’t care about being infected.
Security just wants everyone out, both the PCs and the cultists they’re fighting. Security has powerful control abilities- a fire hose to push people, a sonic weapon to prone people. (Don’t stun your players or prevent them from actually playing on their turn, but move them around and add costs to some actions)
Several NPCs are channeling spells. They are individually weak, but spread out. Each spell that completes adds consequences and complications. Perhaps they affect the current scene (eg: blow a hole in the wall allowing demons from outside to flow in) or maybe it affects the plot (they conjure a plague upon the player’s home city)
Yeah this is why facts and evidence aren’t that persuasive. We’re all emotional first. All of us
Oh, I personally agree. I want my players engaged and adding flavor to the world. If I didn’t, I’d be better off writing a book.
But I used to be more of a “you’re having fun wrong” jerk in my youth, so I make extra effort now to be clear that something might not be for me, it’s okay if you’re all having harmless fun with it. ( I still struggle when people tell me about their game of modern day vampires doing political intrigue run in D&D 5e instead of Vampire, but we all have our foibles. )
I discovered a couple years ago that some players hate being given any creative control over the setting. They’re extremely passive and want to be told a story. that’s a valid way to play, but very alien to me.
When I had a wizard character mention his wizard school I let him color in a lot of details. I’d intervene if it was badly breaking established canon (eg: we said it’s in a remote desert and now you want it to be in a coastal city), but generally it’s great.
Right. We could argue details but that’s more or less acceptable to me.
But getting to somewhere like that from here is a real uphill battle.
I’ve posted it a bunch lately but it really does feel like people hate all the pieces of capitalism without realizing they’re all connected.
This feels like an origin story for a Punisher reboot.
I really hope we get through this, and all the people who supported trump are convicted of crimes against humanity or something. We can’t just keep letting conservatism break out every couple decades like a herpes infection.
For many of then, if they were capable of looking at the world and drawing good conclusions, they wouldn’t be conservative to begin with.
I wouldn’t say it’s hopeless, but something as basic as “facts” and “evidence” isn’t going to be enough to reach someone who’s a fragile, terrified, ego wrapped in a thick blanket of emotions and lies.
Also the text says
When Jesus heard this, he said to him, “You still lack one thing. Sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
That’s not a metaphor. The camel thing was a colorful metaphor to demonstrate the point.
That’s luke 18:22
Most people who call themselves Christians do a piss poor job of it. Some of them then go “oh well I’ll be forgiven it’s okay”. That’s not really following the intent. That’s trying to take advantage of someone’s kindness.
Privately owned centralized platforms like Reddit, Twitter, Instagram, etc, are a recipe for disaster. So I left.