Removed by mod

Incomprehensible comment.

Yeah, it’s still popping.

Honestly, I totally get that. But for what it’s worth, the game is more than just maximizing efficiencies like this. This is just a crazy case for me.

Multiboxing is not botting. Conflating the two implies ignorance.

For context, “multiboxing” is running multiple clients at once, and usually stacking them on a single monitor and rapidly flicking through them with a program like EVE-O Preview to activate commands with the mouse in short order. It is allowed in EVE, it is not against the TOS. Some people multibox with tiled windows, or one per monitor, though, because they prefer it for various reasons.

It blew my mind because I wasn’t expecting it.

does dbz talk shit different than other anime? I feel like everyone kind of talks shit to everybody else in every anime with heroes and villains.

I don’t know. Never watched it.

Was he saying that talking mad shit was specifically compelling to black people?

That is what he meant. I interpreted it as “fuck yeah dude, that shit rules” more than “we talk shit” but who the hell knows.

I towed a guys truck one time. Nerdy fella, talked a ton. Said he loved DBZ. I fucking went for it, said “yo why did every one of the black dudes I know growing up love DBZ?” And without missing a beat he looks at me and goes “they talk MAD shit in the show man.” Blew my mind.

Wow, such a thoughtful and useful comment. I had to be carful to avoid spoilers and you were super sensitive to that while still giving great advice. Bravo and thank you.

The controller support seems good, but this style of platform shooter is pretty rough in general with the swivel aim. I think you could skip this one if you are a controller user (I love them too).

Got any wise tips on how to enjoy the game, without giving anything away? I am at home in these sandboxes, but wouldn’t want to miss out on something fun.

Seethe much? Holy smokes, get it together.

It’s okay to be embarrassed because you didn’t know how the Nielsen rating worked and I gently pointed out how easy it was to determine.

It’s okay.

You don’t need to reply and get upset over it and result to personal attacks. It’s not a good look on you, champ.

Did this sound better in your head?

A 1.2 rating sounds bad …

Do you see the pH scale and go “hmm, a pH of 1 seems bad”?

It’s always remarkable to me when people feel the need to attach their approval or judgment to things they have absolutely zero clue about — despite the answer being a cursory Google search away.

Here’s a current list of of the top-10 Nielsen-rated programs as of last week:

1	NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL       9.6
2	SUNDAY NIGHT NFL PRE-KICK	6.9
3	60 MINUTES	                6.8
4	MNF ON ABC (BUF AT NYJ)	        6.7
5	FOOTBALL NIGHT IN AMERICA PT 3	5.2
6	MON NIGHT KICKOFF	        4.7
7	YELLOWSTONE 1	                4.1
8	AMERICA'S GOT TALENT-TUE	3.4
9	AMERICA'S GOT TALENT-WED	3.0
10	FOOTBALL NIGHT IN AMERICA PT 2	2.2

The tenth-most-watched program had a score of 2.2.

There’s a grain of truth in here, but not quite. One in every four or so (not quite, but we can roll with it regardless) identified species of animal is a beetle. Not one in every four animals, by population nor overall species.

The reasons for this is are many, but may include because beetles are big, easy to catch, agriculturally-significant, and are particularly easy to pin and study, dramatically boosting the count of beetle species we work with on an academic level (lending to higher identification rates). There are also just a shitload of beetle species, naturally.

Scientists estimate something closer to ~10 million species of animals, which would still make beetles a huge percentage of the species, but a far cry from 25%. If you looked at the total number (estimated) of individual animals, beetles are pretty insignificant.

Source: Studied entomology and love me some Coleoptera

I love how when new waves of people discover old technology, there are always these types of fundamental questions.

Firefox has been here for a long time. Plenty of people use it. Casuals don’t care about what browser they have installed. That’s the entire conversation!

The actual interesting part of these questions popping up is the staggering lack of awareness. We can click your profile, and, as I’ve linked above, see you try Firefox for the first time, ever. Then, you proceed to ask fundamental questions like the one in this thread without referencing that you’re brand new to the software, or that you haven’t bothered to look up previous discussions.

As for being the “reasonable conservative” in the room, well, I’ll let that speak for itself.

Your entire argument applies to books as well.

It’s a bad argument.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator