Even the phrase “improving the situation in Gaza” can be ambiguous.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

Get an S/MIME certificate and send from an S/MIME compatible email client.

They’re kinda addressable in that the electron beam scans across a line, and every through each line, with a pulse activating the (iirc phosphor) at the pixel for the desired colour.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

When does a colloquial term become a non-colloquial? Usage by government/official contexts?

In August 2022, Minister of Immigration Michael Wood referred to 85,000 holders of recently approved New Zealand 2021 resident visas as “new Kiwis”.

New Zealand -> Kiwi.

Human languages: the words are made up and the rules don’t matter.

Especially true for English.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

All: 🫠

At least we don’t use the Roman method of varied hour lengths depending in the time of day and times of year.

In what way?

It also works both ways: invest in passenger rail, services can improve, and so more people will use trains.

I’m not on desktop so can’t inspect to see the img src.

But it’s possible for a url in img src to have a different response (ie, html) when it’s a direct navigation (ie new tab).

Presumably to disable that hot linking from other websites/apps. Especially if they use scrapers.

But yeah, bad ux.

bootstrapping problem.

But to where would they expel the Jews if they did not have some level of support for Zionism and allow Israel to exist?

I imagine that theoretical speed could only be used for drone planes.

It’s electioneering in that it is to create damage control ahead of dropping or delaying any promised reward to those that voted for the income tax cut.

It can allow them to defer until they claim that NZ is not fragile, which would probably be as a re-election campaign: vote for us because WE fixed a fragile economy, let’s keep the momentum so that we can let people keep more of their hard earned income.