You can do the notes with shift.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
nimble@programming.devto
Technology@lemmy.world•Louis Rossmann taunts Bambu Lab by hosting banned 3D Printer firmware fork, dares $1 billion company to sue him — more creators pledge support and boycotts, Snapmaker donates equipment to embattled deEnglish
4·3 months agoI think it would be very difficult to argue that that is reasonable but that would be up to the courts to decide.
nimble@programming.devto
Technology@lemmy.world•Louis Rossmann taunts Bambu Lab by hosting banned 3D Printer firmware fork, dares $1 billion company to sue him — more creators pledge support and boycotts, Snapmaker donates equipment to embattled deEnglish
4·3 months agoRossmann has only reuploaded the slicer fork, not any firmware (the article title is inaccurate). But yes, the slicer’s AGPL license does not apply to the firmware.
nimble@programming.devto
Technology@lemmy.world•Louis Rossmann taunts Bambu Lab by hosting banned 3D Printer firmware fork, dares $1 billion company to sue him — more creators pledge support and boycotts, Snapmaker donates equipment to embattled deEnglish
3·3 months agoYou aren’t understanding the GPL correctly.
- The GPL applies to code built on top of GPL code, this is the viral nature of the GPL.
- Anyone with a GPL license for the code can license anyone else, it does not have to come from the original creator. So Rossmann has a license granted by the creator of the fork. Also the source that Bambu Lab provide on GitHub provides a license as well.
nimble@programming.devto
Technology@lemmy.world•Louis Rossmann taunts Bambu Lab by hosting banned 3D Printer firmware fork, dares $1 billion company to sue him — more creators pledge support and boycotts, Snapmaker donates equipment to embattled deEnglish
5·3 months agolime
That page doesn’t say that at all. You can paywall the software and the source together for any price (but note that anyone who buys the software can now give out the source freely). Or you can charge for the source freely but only “for a price no more than your reasonable cost of physically performing this conveying of source”.
But most places have publicly owned garbage collection, no?
nimble@programming.devto
Technology@lemmy.world•AI agent writes blog post to shame a developer after he refused it's code contribution.English
3·6 months agoDespite the limited changes the PR makes, it manages to make several errors.
According to benchmarks in issue #31130:
- With broadcast: np.column_stack → 36.47 µs, np.vstack().T → 27.67 µs (24% faster)
- Without broadcast: np.column_stack → 20.63 µs, np.vstack().T → 13.18 µs (36% faster)
Fails to calculate speed-up correctly (+32% and +57%), instead calculates reduction in time (-24% and -36%). Also those figures are just regurgitated from the original issue.
The improvement comes from np.vstack().T doing contiguous memory copies and returning a view, whereas np.column_stack has to interleave elements in memory.
Regurgitated information from the original issue.
Changes
- Modified 3 files
- Replaced 3 occurrences of np.column_stack with np.vstack().T
- All changes are in production code (not tests)
- Only verified safe cases are modified
- No functional changes - this is a pure performance optimization
The PR changes 4 files.
Was 204 (#754 medium) possible?


Reasons game developers don’t like steam keys from sites like G2A are:
The last reason could apply to reselling steam accounts as well.